Universities nationally have seen positive outcomes in student learning and success through the use of hybrid courses.  A hybrid course by definition includes both regularly scheduled, on-site classroom meetings and significant online components that replace at least 40% of regularly scheduled class meeting time.  This RFP is designed to explore the use of hybrid course structure to more fully meet the educational learning outcomes for both undergraduates and graduate students in 4XX/5XX courses.

The Graduate School is offering compensation and course development support to OSU faculty for the redesign of established classroom4xx/5xx-level “slash” courses into hybrid courses.  Faculty participants will receive $3000 paid either as overload pay or professional development funding, will participate in a faculty learning community–facilitated by the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL)–on effective practices in hybrid course design, and will receive individual support from the CTL instructional designer as well as the Ecampus Program Development and Training Team.  Details are provided below.
The new hybrid courses will serve on-site students, and they will adhere to the regular on-site (not Ecampus) tuition structure.  It is anticipated that the new hybrid sections will replace the existing fully classroom-based section (for example, the new hybrid CH 427/527 would replace the existing classroom-based CH 427/527).  Participation is limited to 6 faculty participants for the Winter 2013 term.

Graduate faculty approved to teach graduate courses and who have taught at least 2 years at OSU are eligible to participate.  Faculty should submit hybrid course development proposals with a supporting message from the respective academic unit head.

 

Funding

The Graduate School will allocate $3000 per course to each participating faculty member who develops a hybrid course, paid either as overload pay or as professional development funds and as allowed by university policy.  Overload pay will be subject to taxes and withholding.  If multiple instructors work as a team to develop the hybrid course, the $3,000 stipend will be equally split among them.

These funds are in support of:

1 – Participation in the CTL faculty learning community focused on hybrid course development, approximately a 30-hour commitment.  This group will have a blend of online activities and approximately five, two-hour face-to-face meetings on the Corvallis campus during the Winter 2013 term.

AND

2 – Providing course content and working with the CTL instructional designer and members of the Ecampus Program Development and Training Team to redesign and produce a new hybrid course.

The CTL, in collaboration with Ecampus, will provide basic course development and production support (instructional design and best practices, including accessibility and copyright; project management; media development; Blackboard course development, training, and on-going support). Training and support is available for all participants in Blackboard, multimedia, pedagogy for hybrid courses, and video production.  Resources in Technology Across the Curriculum and Media Services will also be available to support the technology in the classroom component of hybrid courses.

Please note this program is explicitly for faculty who would like to redesign an existing classroom course as a hybrid during Winter 2013, not faculty who already intend to teach the course as a hybrid during Winter 2013.

 

Timeline

An initial meeting between the instructor and the instructional designer will occur in December, followed by hybrid course development—including participation in faculty learning community—during the Winter 2013 term. The hybrid course must be offered for the first time by Winter 2014.

 

Requirements

Instructor must fully participate in the “Hybrid Course Development” faculty learning community, including completion of all online activities and attendance at all scheduled face-to-face meetings.  The meetings will be on Tuesdays from 2:00 to 3:50 pm in Milam 215 on Jan. 15 and 29, Feb. 12 and 26, and March 12.

Online portions of each hybrid course will be designed and delivered through the Blackboard course management system.  Multimedia components may be included in course design as needed to meet specified learning objectives.

Instructors will work with the CTL instructional designer to redesign the hybrid course according to best practices in blended learning and OSU accreditation standards.

  • Course can be readily redesigned for hybrid delivery without excessive development cost.
  • Academic unit accepts responsibility for the curriculum and quality of instruction.
  • Hybrid course will be offered at least once per year.
  • Hybrid course will be available to all OSU students who meet prerequisites.
  • Separate learning outcomes must be clearly stated for undergraduates and graduate students enrolled in the course.
  • Instructor must demonstrate basic skills in computer use.
  • For syllabus and online components of the hybrid course, instructor will follow OSU course quality standards as described in

o   Ecampus Course Quality Standards  –Sections 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0

o   “Best Practices in Designing a Course” (see particularly 0.2, 0.2.1 and 0.2.2 under Course Planning and Design)

o   OSU Curricular Policies and Procedures

and other research-based best practices for blended and online courses such as those of the 2011-2013 Quality Matters Rubric Standards.

  • Any online content requiring Ecampus staff development time for graphics, animation or multimedia work must be delivered to Ecampus staff at least 6 weeks in advance of the term in which the course will be offered. Faculty should consult with Ecampus as soon as possible about any multimedia development to allow sufficient production time.

New hybrid courses must include both regularly scheduled, on-site classroom meetings for both undergraduates and graduate students enrolled in the class and significant online components that replace at least 40% of regularly scheduled class meeting time for students.  So, for example, hybrid delivery of a 3-credit course that normally meets for two 80-minute periods each week might involve meeting face-to-face for one undergraduate weekly meeting and one graduate student weekly meeting each blended with online activities, assignments and assessments that require student engagement at a level equivalent to a full 3-credit course for each cohort.

 

Proposal Guidelines

Applicants are asked to submit a narrative proposal of 2 to 3 pages, which includes the following information in this order:

1.     Course designator, title and credits.

2.     Instructor’s contact information and rank.

3.     Degree, program(s), or certificate to which this course would apply and the role/importance of this course to the program(s); and/or description of audience or express need for this course.

4.     Is there currently a fully online (Ecampus) version of the course?

5.     Typical enrollment in each section of the course, and total number of sections of the course offered per year.

6.     Proposed terms to be taught as a hybrid course.

7.     Instructor’s experience with Blackboard and online technologies.  Both instructors without online teaching experience and veteran online instructors are encouraged to apply.

8.     Instructor’s (or department chair’s) rationale for converting this specific course to hybrid delivery.

9.     One paragraph of preliminary ideas for course design, learning materials and online resources upon which the course will be based.

10.  One paragraph describing why instructor is interested in participation in this program.

11.  Indication of academic unit’s approval for hybrid course development and ongoing offerings of hybrid course.  This approval can be by separate email from head of academic unit.

12.  Attach a current course syllabus to the proposal.

 

To Find Out More about Hybrid Courses and This Program

The Center for Teaching and Learning will offer an hour-long workshop about the hybrid pilot program–including tips for successful proposal preparation–and effective practices for hybrid course design on Thu., Oct. 11, 1:00 pm, in Milam 215.  To register, go tohttp://calendar.oregonstate.edu/event/71815/.   Additionally, the CTL has many resources about hybrid teaching and learning athttp://oregonstate.edu/ctl/hybrid-course-initiative.

 

Submission of Proposals

Submit proposals for the hybrid course development pilot program by email by Friday, Oct. 19, to:

Cub Kahn, Instructional Designer

Center for Teaching and Learning

323 Waldo Hall

Cub.Kahn@oregonstate.edu

 

Announcement of Award

Decisions will be announced by Nov. 5, 2012.

Upon acceptance, an MOU will be drawn up with the academic unit for course production, use of course and materials, control and credit, distribution of supporting funds, and course delivery.  Funds will be sent to the academic unit by budget transfer upon satisfactory completion of hybrid course development and all program requirements.

Please address questions to Cub.Kahn@oregonstate.edu or call 7-2803.

Funding Opportunity

Sponsor:         Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Grand Challenges Explorations, Round 10

Amount:         Up to $100,000

Deadline:        Applications accepted until November 7, 2012 at 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will accept grant proposals until November 7, 2012 for Grand Challenges Explorations Round 10, an initiative to encourage bold and innovative research on new global health solutions.

The topics for this round of the Grand Challenges Explorations in Global Health are:

  • New Approaches in Model Systems, Diagnostics, and Drugs for Specific Neglected Tropical Diseases
  • Labor Saving Innovations for Women Smallholder Farmers
  • New Approaches for the Interrogation of Anti-malarial Compounds
  • Aid is Working. Tell the World (Part 2)

Successful projects have the opportunity to receive a follow-on grant of up to $1 million.

The Grand Challenges Explorations initiative uses an agile, accelerated grant-making process with short two-page applications and no preliminary data required. Applications are submitted online, and winning grants are chosen approximately five months from the submission deadline.

The grant program is open to anyone from any discipline, from student to tenured professor, and from any organization – colleges and universities, government laboratories, research institutions, non-profit organizations and for-profit companies.

Following are some tips provided by the Gates Foundation for grant seekers wishing to submit proposals:

 

  • Proposals must represent an innovative approach responsive to the topic.  There are other avenues of funding for the equally important research that is within currently accepted paradigms.  Such work will not be funded under Grand Challenges Explorations.

 

  • Proposals will be reviewed by a panel with broad expertise and a track record in identifying innovations – these reviewers may not be deep domain experts in your field.  Ideas should be described in clear language without the use of jargon unique to a particular field.

 

  • Proof-of-concept for ideas need not be completed in Phase I. However, credible evidence supporting the validity of an idea, sufficient proof to warrant expanded support, and next steps for the project should be provided.

 

  • Grant seekers must select only one of the topics under which to submit and may submit only one proposal. Submit your best idea. You may submit multiple ideas in partnership with collaborators, but an individual PI may lead the submission of only one proposal each round of Grand Challenges.

 

  • You must select a topic prior to submitting a proposal. View the detailed topic descriptions and determine which topic best suits your idea. You may change your topic and edit your proposal any time before the application deadline.

A full description of the Grand Challenges Explorations initiative and application instructions is available at:

http://www.grandchallenges.org/Explorations/Pages/ApplicationInstructions.aspx.

If you have questions, contact Martha Coleman, Director of Principal Gifts for Foundation Relations at OSU Foundation by phone at 541-737-6961 or via email at Martha.coleman@oregonstate.edu.

2012 LPS

The 2012 Pauling Symposium & Banquet will be held on Saturday, October 6, 2012 on the campus of The University of Washington. The 2012 Medalist is Professor Robert J. Cava, Russell Wellman Moore Professor of Chemistry at Princeton University.

There is no charge or need to RSVP for the symposium. Attached is a flyer which contains contact information for the banquet ($).

Link to the event website: http://depts.washington.edu/chem/newsevents/pauling2012.html

While I will be addressing Professor Cava on Friday evening, I am unable to attend the symposium and banquet on Saturday.  Please reply (not to all) if you are interested in having me book a van and recruit a driver.

2012 Pauling Symposium and Banquet

The 47th Annual Pauling Medal Award

Saturday, October 6, 2012

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington

Symposium

1:00 pm to 5:00 pm

Mary Gates Hall 389, Auditorium

1:00 pm – Welcoming Remarks

1:15 pm – Ram Seshadri, Professor, Materials Department, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara

“Solid state chemistry and reactivity of noble metal oxides: Pauling electronegativities and gold chemistry”

2:05 pm –Mas Subramanian, Milton Harris Professor of Material Science, Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University

“Beyond the Nature of the Chemical Bond: How close are we to ‘Functional Materials by Design’?”

2:50 pm – Break

3:20 pm – Susan Kauzlarich, Professor, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis

“Adding 3+ rare earths to transition metal Zintl phases and their resulting magnetic and thermoelectric properties”

4:05 pm – Introduction of Roberrt J. Cava

4:10 pm –Robert J. Cava, 2012 Pauling Award Winner, Russell Wellman Moore Professor of Chemistry, Princeton University

“A Molecule in a Metal – Dimer Formation in ThCr2Si2-type Pnictides”

Determining how crystal structure and chemical bonding influence the properties of solids is at the heart of collaborative research programs between solid state chemists and materials physicists. In some important electronic materials – the high temperature copper oxide superconductors and “colossal magnetoresistance” manganese oxides for example – stoichiometry, structure, bonding, and properties are coupled to yield an almost baffling complexity of chemistry-physics relationships, while in others, such as many classical intermetallic superconductors, bonding and structure play a much less profound role. In this talk I will describe some of our recent work on superconductor-related ThCr2Si2-type solid solution phases as examples of the kinds of insights that structural and chemical studies can contribute to understanding the electronic properties of materials.

5:00 pm – Final Remarks

Public Reception following the Symposium

Mary Gates 135, Commons

Banquet and Medal Presentation

Reservations/Tickets Required

6:30 pm to 9:30 pm

Kane Hall 225, Walker-Ames Room

Symposium Chair:

Professor Jim Mayer, University of Washington

For more information, contact:

Diana Knight

206-543-1611

knight@chem.washington.edu

Popular Mechanics’ prediction took considerably more than 10 years to come true, but today’s flat-panel screens have gone well beyond that early vision. Some of them are nearly as big as a living room wall. They bring us unimaginably sharp detail, from the spots on butterfly wings to the grimace on a linebacker’s face.

This technology — whether hooked up to your cable feed, DVD player, wi-fi or computer — is also becoming integral to daily life. It increasingly provides the platforms on which we shop, share photos, read books, keep up with friends, play games, manage finances and work. In 2011, the global flat-panel screen industry shipped more than $120 billion worth of products, enough to cover nearly 16,000 football fields.

However, our love of flashy high-res has a dark side. Manufacturing the semiconductors behind these electronic systems produces waste, lots of it. “The electronics and solar industries build devices where the materials input is very high relative to what ends up in the product. There’s tremendous amounts of waste and very high energy input,” says Doug Keszler, Oregon State University chemist.

Keszler and a team of scientists and engineers at Oregon State and the University of Oregon are leading a national consortium bent on greening the flat-panel display industry. In their future, windows, mirrors, walls and counters could display messages and harvest solar energy. “We’re trying to turn this industry into a truly zero-waste proposition while improving performance,” says Keszler, a principal scientist in the Center for Sustainable Materials Chemistry (CSMC). “We’d like to do electronics the size of a wall. The question is: How do you do that efficiently without producing even more waste?”

Startups Provide Jobs

The CSMC has already produced significant results: a metal-insulator-metal diode (a kind of electronic switch) that outperforms the fastest silicon-based semiconductors; water-based manufacturing techniques that reduce waste and improve productivity; high-resolution fabrication processes that forge thinner electronic components. With research roots going back more than a decade at OSU and UO, the center has spun off two startup companies, generated more than a dozen U.S. patents and developed an educational partnership to inspire more Oregon high school students to attend college. It also helps graduates to create their own careers. In cooperation with the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, CSMC students join business leaders in the chemical and electronics industries to identify commercial opportunities stemming from research.

“About two-thirds of all Ph.D. graduates in the physical sciences now find their first job in a startup company,” says Keszler. “There is very little education to prepare students for that career path. We train them to recognize market value in their research, so they can work effectively with entrepreneurs and business development people.”

Two startups have already hired the center’s graduates. Amorphyx (www.amorphyx.com) is commercializing a new electronics manufacturing process that limits the production of unwanted industrial byproducts. Moreover, it trims a six-part process to two steps, offering the possibility of tripling production capacity in an existing facility.

In collaboration with another spinoff, Inpria (www.inpria.com), the center has broken a barrier in high-resolution circuitry, going below the 20-nanometer scale and enabling computer chips to accommodate more functions at higher speeds.

These achievements reflect gains reported by Oregon State engineer John Wager, physicist Janet Tate, graduate student Randy Hoffman and other researchers as early as 2003. They noted that transparent thin-film transistors made of zinc oxide could lead to new kinds of liquid-crystal displays, the dominant type of flat-panel screen. In 2006, HP licensed the technology and has been developing applications in collaboration with OSU.

At UO in 2003, researchers in Darren Johnson’s chemistry lab discovered a solution-based process for making nanoclusters, leading to the possibility that new semiconductors could be made without hazardous chemicals. Jason Gatlin, the UO graduate student who discovered the process, instigated a new UO-OSU collaboration when he shared his findings at a conference sponsored by the Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute.

“We’re pushing the boundaries of science and seeing things no one has ever seen before,” says Keszler. “There’s a lot of joy in the intellectual exchanges in such a diverse group.”

To attract more young scientists to their journey, CSMC students will begin working with Hermiston High School teacher Lisa Frye and her chemistry classes this fall. They will provide support, advanced instruction and resources to inspire high-school students to consider careers in science.

“What we’re after over the next 10 years,” says Keszler, “is to put the (industrial) ecosystem together that allows you to print electronics on flexible glass. They will be high performance, durable, and include applications such as solar collectors.”

We’ve come a long way from the futuristic idea of hanging TV screens like paintings on the walls of our homes.

Hello everyone – Please join me in congratulating Carlos Monzano, graduate student in Dr. Staci Simonich’s laboratory for being recognized by NIEHS on the SRP webpage for receiving the highly prestigious 2012 Student Paper Award from the American Chemical Society (ACS), which he presented during the 244th ACS National Meeting in Philadelphia.  Carlos received the award for his research developing different gas chromatography (GC) techniques to  separate and identify mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).  The announcement is located on the SRP homepage (http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/srp/index.cfm) and the rest of the story is on the news page (http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/srp/news/index.cfm).

Congratulations to Carlos and Staci!

Last month’s article focused on marinomycin, a cyclic polyketal with rather obvious symmetry – and the synthetic strategy hinged on that feature. However, symmetry in natural products isn’t always so apparent and it is uncovering such ‘hidden symmetry’ that forms the core of this month’s column.

Again, we’re plunging into the marine depths to find natural products with prodigious biological activity. The amphidinolide family comprises over 30 members, varying in architecture but (almost) all featuring a complex and highly decorated macrolactone ring at the core. Amphidinolide F was first isolated in 1991, but as yet remains unconquered territory in synthetic laboratories.1,2However, new ground has been broken by a pair of chemists from Oregon State University, US, led by Rich Carter.3 Their key insight was that hidden symmetry exists in the complex tetrahydrofuran (THF) regions. Although these two regions are not identical, the team considered that enough chemistry was in common that a mutual precursor might be used.

Read More…

 

I hope you can join us for the first Resident Scholar lecture of the 2012-13 academic year, which is scheduled for Wednesday, September 5th at 2:00 in the Willamette Room (3rd floor of the Library).  The Special Collections and Archives Research Center is proud to welcome our Resident Scholar, Dr. Pnina Abir-Am of Brandeis University.  Information on Dr. Abir-Am and her presentation follows below, and a promotional flyer is attached.

As is customary, refreshments will be served. We hope you can join us for what promises to be a very engaging talk.

Title: “Pauling’s Boys” and the DNA Structure Mystery

Abstract: The talk inquires into the possible role of Pauling’s close associates, widely known as ‘Pauling’s Boys’, in Pauling’s brief and puzzling engagement with DNA structure, 1951-1953. Based on archives opened since the 50th anniversary of this discovery, as well as recent SCARC acquisitions, most notably the Jack D. Dunitz Papers, the talk sheds new light on this still incomprehensible episode in the history of science. The talk is based on a chapter in a forthcoming book, DNA at 50: Memory, History, and Politics, which benefitted from NSF, NIH, and OSU Libraries sponsorship.

On the speaker:  Pnina G. Abir-Am has been a Resident Scholar at the Brandeis University Women’s Studies Research Center since 2007. Prior to that she held research and teaching positions at Johns Hopkins, UC-Berkeley, the University of Ottawa, and CNRS-Paris. She holds a Ph.D. from the French University of Montreal and an M.Sc. from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, both in the history of science.

Pnina has published widely on the history of molecular biology, public memory, women in science, and science policy.  For example, she was the first to establish the impact of the Rockefeller Foundation on the rise of molecular biology with several case studies from the 1930s, including Pauling’s. (Social Studies of Science, 1982 & 1984)  More recently, she has become interested in dramatizing the history of science and is currently looking for collaborators on a play focusing on Pauling’s involvement with protein and DNA structures, among other preoccupations, in the 1930s and 1950s.

The Faculty Recognition and Awards Committee is now accepting nominations for the inaugural Faculty Industry Partnering Award:

The Faculty Industry Partnering Award recognizes a faculty member who achieves extraordinarily high impact innovations through research collaborations with industry.

 

The selection criteria include:

  • exceptional engagement in collaborative research with industry
  • research leadership recognized nationally and internationally
  • high degree of student engagement in industry research efforts

 

Additional information, including nomination procedures, are available online at http://oregonstate.edu/senate/awards/nom/partner/criteria.html. Nominations are due in the Faculty Senate Office on September 6.

 

This is a new award and the timeline is short to accommodate awarding of a recipient at the 2012 University Day. In subsequent years nominations for this award will be solicited earlier in the academic year.

 

NSF – Small Business Technology Transfer Program Phase I Solicitation FY-2013 (STTR)

http://nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf12592/nsf12592.htm

NSF Letter of Intent Due Date: October 20, 2012 – November 20, 2012

The Small Business Technology Transfer program stimulates technological innovation in the private sector by strengthening the role of small business concerns in meeting Federal research and development needs, increasing the commercial application of federally supported research results, and fostering and encouraging participation by socially and economically disadvantaged and women-owned small businesses.

The STTR requires researchers at universities and other non-profit research institutions to play a significant intellectual role in the conduct of each STTR project. These researchers, by joining forces with a small company, can spin-off their commercially promising ideas while they remain primarily employed at the research institution.

Research Topic for this Solicitation:

NSF seeks to help reach the nation’s biological innovation goals, and the larger objective of growing the bioeconomy. The bioeconomy has emerged as a national priority because of its growth potential across many key industries and its societal benefits, which include transforming manufacturing processes, increasing agricultural productivity, advancing medicine, addressing energy needs, and meeting challenges in the environment. The STTR research topic for this solicitation is Enhancing the Bioeconomy using emerging Biological Technologies (EBBT). Proposals must use a biologically-based approach, such as synthetic biology, systems biology, metabolic engineering, proteomics, bioinformatics, and computational biology, to address business opportunities in key industry sectors including biomedical, biomanufacturing, and sustainable agriculture.

Limit on Number of Proposal per Organization: 2

WEBINAR: A webinar will be held within 6 weeks of the release date of this NSF solicitation to answer any questions about the solicitation. Details will be posted on the SBIR/STTR website: http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/sbir/index.jsp as they become available.

 

Thank you,

Debbie

 

Debbie Delmore
Incentive Programs Manager
Research Office
Oregon State University

EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2012 DEBBIE DELMORE IS LOCATED IN SNELL HALL, ROOM 406
MAILING ADDRESS: A312 Kerr Administration Building
Corvallis, OR  97331-2140
541-737-8390
Fax: 541-737-9041
debbie.delmore@oregonstate.edu
http://oregonstate.edu/research/