What do you do when mentorship doesn’t exist? Build it. Or at least that’s what we did.
I was hired in Fall ’24 to be the Assistant Coordinator of Supplemental Instruction (SI). At that time, I barely knew what SI was. Weeks into the job I had student staffers, SI Leaders, asking for help that I didn’t yet know how to give, but I knew a thing SI Leaders do. At a study table, an SI Leader redirects questions, they pivot and pull in others to give them a chance to build confidence by helping their peers. So, I did an approximation of that. I connected one extremely competent student staffer with the newcomer dealing with challenges.
Then it happened again. And again.
By the time winter term rolled around, I was getting better at my job. I knew enough to help, but there were times when a peer mentor was needed, and there was no structure. I recommended this student, that student; the experienced and friendly and knowledgeable, to those looking for mentorship. Usually, I had the chance to chat with both students first, to prep the duo for success, but not always.
I like structure. Not too much, but enough to help people succeed. The system as it stood was messy, improvised, and only helped those who came to me and asked. Chatting it over with some of those I’d directed students towards, that I’d asked to be informal mentors, we decided to make it an actual ‘thing.’ I sent out one email for volunteers and got twelve replies from our team of roughly forty: five seniors who wanted to help design it, and seven underclassmen who wanted to design it, train for it, and be mentors. It only took three meetings.
Meeting Overviews
Meeting 1 involved collecting what mattered, what they wanted it to be. I suggested things here and there, largely to consolidate similar ideas, but that was it.
Meeting 2 involved splitting into two groups going over what their mentors had done, what a mentor can’t do, what the mentor/mentee relationship should be, and comparing between the groups.
Meeting 3 was for consolidation. We put all the pieces together and made it into a training schedule.
Here is a detailed list of meeting topics and notes, so you can see the range and depth of thinking in each meeting. The topics and plan were student-driven and informed by SI Leader experiences and perspective on how we could better support incoming SI Leaders.
So What?
It’s all about the journey. I believe that, and this journey reminded me of it. At the end of that term, we had a document, a plan, and a group of brilliant people who were ready to make it a reality, but we all knew it’d evolve. It wasn’t a project that ended, it was a journey with a pause. Now, I’m looking at spring and planning another design meeting.
As a supervisor this felt easy, natural, but it was only that because we did it together. Twelve students built something that would help the nineteen joining the team then, the eighteen joining the team soon, and who knows how many to come thereafter.
My advice is to trust good people to do good things, to build something ambitious, insightful, and amazing. There may be moments where you need to keep things on track, clarify confusion, or keep the creation inside the scope of your resources, but be honest, be open, and be flexible.