Ed Davis, CQLS

In a collaboration between the Tom Sharpton and Steve Giovannoni labs in the microbiology department, graduate student Seb Singleton designed and performed a study to examine degradation of, and the communities that form biofilms on, plastics in the ocean. Plastic waste accumulation in marine environments is a growing problem that has global effects on the macro and micro scales. In order to understand the ecology surrounding plastic-colonizing bacteria in marine environments, Seb designed a 3 month-long study to examine the changes in biofilm communities as well as structural and chemical changes in the polymer surfaces on high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), and polypropylene (PP). An overview of the study design is shown below in Figure 1 from the paper.

Figure 1. Summarized experimental workflow: sample collection (biweekly over 3 months) to downstream analysis [cultivation, 16S (V4) sequence analysis, ATR-FTIR spectral analysis and HIM imaging].

The CQLS, including sequencing using the MiSeq platform in the core lab, as well as bioinformatics consulting done by senior bioinformatics scientist Ed Davis, was integral to the successful outcome of this study. The study encountered several technical roadblocks that were overcome using novel analytical techniques that leveraged the CQLS compute infrastructure. Here is a brief summary of the findings and difficulties overcome:

  • Initial Dominance: Common marine microbial families such as Alteromonadaceae, Marinomonadaceae, and Vibrionaceae were initially prevalent.
  • Community Shift: A significant transition in microbial composition occurred between days 42 and 56, with Hyphomonadaceae and Rhodobacteraceae becoming more dominant. These community shifts also coincided with the passing of Tropical Storm Henri!
  • Rare Taxa: 8,641 colonizing taxa (Amplicon Sequence Variants; ASVs) were identified in total, with 594 overall ASVs enriched on one or more polymer types vs. the glass control, and only 25 ASVs, including known hydrocarbon degraders, significantly enriched on specific plastics.
    • Plastic types differ in the ‘rare’ taxa they recruit: Five were specifically enriched on HDPE, nine on LDPE, and eleven on PP.
  • Taxonomic Assignment Difficulties: Of the 594 significant ASVs, many were unable to be classified to lower taxonomic levels using a classifier trained on the Silva database (i.e. Family and/or Genus level). An alternative classification scheme, called Cladal Taxonomic Annotation (CTA), provided additional taxonomic assignments to 171 (29%) of the significantly enriched ASVs. Most importantly, 8 of the 25 plastic-specific significantly enriched ASVs were better assigned after the CTA.

The shift in taxa over the study period are shown below in Figure 5 from the study:

Figure 5. Gradual temporal shift in a/b diversity shared among material colonizing communities. The Shannon alpha diversity plot (A), Bray-Curtis PCoA (MDS) ordination (B), and Relative abundance stacked bar chart (C) showcase the transition in community complexity and inter-, intra-group similarity over time. In plot (A), alpha diversity measures of the substrate attached communities sharply increases following the mid-experimental transition (between days 42 and 56). Plot (B) explores the compositional dissimilarity of the microbial communities (9,069 unique ASVs) present on the plastics, glass and seawater over the incubation period based on a Bray-Curtis distance matrix. Plot (C) shows the community composition of the top 5% taxa present in each substrate type throughout the incubation period.

Taxa enriched on one or more plastics throughout the study are shown below in Figure 7 from
the paper:

Figure 7. Polymer enriched marine taxa. The Log2foldchange plot showcases NBC classified ASVs that were significantly enriched (adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05) on either one or more polymer types throughout the incubation. The color, size and shape of the data points are associated with the enriched taxon’s class, mean abundance, and substrate preference, respectively. Mean abundance is the average of the sequence depth normalized count values for all included samples, whereas Log2FoldChange is the effect size estimate. All ASVs listed possess >3 log fold differences in abundance compared to glass. Day 42 (and 56 for HDPE) Log2FoldChange data were not included due to loss of sample replicates at the time point, similar rationale was used for Day 14 for all three polymers in respect to the loss of glass control biological replicates.

Degradation of plastics was confirmed using high resolution helium ion microscropy (HIM), and
relevant examples are shown below from Figure 4 of the paper:

Figure 4. Post incubation biodegradation artifacts. HIM images of 77-day incubated polyolefins with biofilm removed in contrast to unexposed controls to exhibit artifacts of biodegradation by colonizing taxa. Marine-incubated LDPE (A) (1–4), HDPE (B) (1–2) and PP (C) (1–2). Unexposed polyolefins: LDPE (A), HDPE (B) and PP (C).

This research highlights the complex interactions between microbes and plastic surfaces in
marine environments, offering insights into the ecological impact of plastic pollution.


Citation: Singleton SL, Davis EW, Arnold HK, Daniels AMY, Brander SM, Parsons RJ, Sharpton
TJ and Giovannoni SJ (2023) Identification of rare microbial colonizers of plastic materials
incubated in a coral reef environment. Front. Microbiol. 14:1259014. doi:
10.3389/fmicb.2023.1259014

Tyler Radniecki, CBEE

Born at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, OSU’s wastewater surveillance efforts, led by Drs. Christine Kelly and Tyler Radniecki (both professors in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering), are still going strong.  On-going collaborative efforts include researching how wastewater surveillance can contribute to pandemic resilient cities (National Science Foundation), creating a national wastewater surveillance network for tracking antibiotic resistance genes, bacteria and pharmaceuticals (US Environmental Protection Agency), as well as monitoring state-wide community disease dynamics for SARS-CoV-2, influenza and RSV (Oregon Health Authority).  Additional current pilot-scale wastewater surveillance projects include monitoring for Candida auris and antibiotic resistance genes at health care facilities and identifying the presence of the markers for H5N1 influenza strain in Oregon communities. 

Throughout it all, Oregon State University’s Center of Quantitative Life Sciences (CQLS) has been a critical partner in these efforts.  CQLS wet lab staff assist with nucleic acid extractions from wastewater, library preparation and sequencing of wastewater samples.  Additionally, CQLS bioinformatics staff have helped develop and implement bioinformatic pipelines to identify wastewater surveillance targets and report relevant results to OHA and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.  I can honestly say that every member of the CQLS staff has played a hand in our wastewater surveillance efforts. 

It is due to our collaborative efforts with CQLS that a lot of exciting advancements in wastewater surveillance have been made.  For instance, in collaboration with the OSU TRACE team, we demonstrated that wastewater surveillance is less biased than clinical surveillance at estimating COVID-19 prevalence in a community and that wastewater surveillance can identify COVID-19 hotspots and variant compositions of a community.  We have used wastewater sequence surveillance to identify COVID-19 variants in a community before they were identified in clinical samples.  Additionally, we demonstrated that wastewater sequence surveillance could accurately identify the COVID-19 variant relative abundances in the state, a critical finding as clinical COVID-19 sequencing has declined substantially from its peak.  Finally, we have used wastewater surveillance data to help evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 policies implemented by Oregon State University during the first two years for the pandemic.

As we continue to move forward with our wastewater surveillance work, the CQLS will remain a critical collaboration.  Together we are developing novel bioinformatic tools and pipelines to identify strains of RSV, norovirus and influenza.  Additionally, we are moving forward with new wastewater surveillance projects that will explore links between the environment and human pathogens as well as use our national wastewater surveillance network to monitor the spread climate sensitive diseases in the US.  While these endeavors remain challenging, I am grateful to have access to the CQLS to advance our goals.

Another great term of the CGRB’s Bioinformatics User Group (BUG) is in the books!

This term we had a wide range of presenters—graduate students to Principle Investigators. It was nice to get the perspective of folks who are in different parts of their careers.

A special thanks to all of our presenters:

Sept 25: Christopher Sullivan and Ken Lett (Center for Genome Research & Biocomputing)

  • Title: CGRB’s new DFS for one and all!, i.e., Don’t know what a Distributed File System is? Come find out!
  • Abstract: The CGRB works with researchers to provide the most robust computational infrastructure available today. Many group rely on file services at the heart of their research computing needs and the CGRB has worked for over 2 decades to provide redundant high speed file services.  Over the years users have grown to expect the best solution at a very cheap price. Because of this model the CGRB spends a great deal of time evaluating the available systems to ensure we always have the best at the lowest price. In the past year the CGRB has worked to evaluate and purchase new file service hardware that will replace our existing setups. We will be explaining the pathway taken to bring the new service online and some of the new exciting features.

Oct 9: Lillian Padgitt-Cobb (David Hendrix Lab, Biochemistry & Biophysics)

  • Title: A phased, diploid assembly of the hop (Humulus lupulus) genome reveals patterns of selection and haplotype variation, i.e., Resolving functional and evolutionary mysteries of a large, complex plant genome with genomic data science
  • Abstract: Hop (Humulus lupulus) is a plant valued for its use in brewing and traditional medicine. Efforts to determine how biosynthetic pathways in hop are regulated have been challenged by its complex genomic landscape. The diploid hop genome is large, repetitive, and heterozygous, which challenged early attempts at sequencing with short-reads. Advances in long-read sequencing have improved detection of repeats and heterozygous regions, revealing that the genome is nearly 78% repetitive. For our assembly, PacBio long-read sequences were assembled with FALCON and phased into haplotype assemblies with FALCON-Unzip. Using the phased, diploid assembly to assess haplotype variation, we discovered genes under positive selection enriched for stress-response, growth, and flowering functions. Comparative analysis of haplotypes provides insight into large-scale structural variation and the selective pressures that have driven hop evolution. The approaches we developed to analyze the phased, diploid assembly of hop have broader applicability to the study of other large, complex genomes.
  • Lillian’s GitHubhttps://github.com/padgittl/CascadeHopAssembly
  • Hop Genome Browserhttp://hopbase.org/

Oct 23: Kelly Vining (Kelly Vining Lab, Horticulture)

  • Title: R/qtl, i.e., Applications and methods for analysis of quantitative traits
  • Abstract: R/qtl is an R package that is used for genetic mapping and marker-trait association. This presentation will explore specific features of R/qtl applied to plant breeding populations. Data types, functions, and interpretation of results will be explored.

Nov 6: Ed Davis (Center for Genome Research & Biocomputing)

  • Title: Introductory microbiome analysis using phyloseq, i.e., How to generate exploratory diversity plots and what they mean
  • Abstract: Generating high quality, publication ready figures for a microbiome study can be somewhat difficult. An understanding of both the statistical tests and how to effectively use R to produce figures is required, so the learning curve can be somewhat steep. Fortunately, there are several easy-to-use packages in R that facilitate the analysis of microbiome studies using 16S amplicon data, including the phyloseq package that will be the focus of my talk. I will cover the basics of analyzing alpha and beta diversity and provide some code and example images to show how to generate publication ready figures starting from the base phyloseq output. I will also generate some exploratory charts and graphs such that one would be able to form and later test hypotheses using microbiome data. I will be happy to share the examples and code as well, so that I might catalyze the analysis of your own microbiome studies.
  • Follow up blog post: https://tips.cgrb.oregonstate.edu/posts/phyloseq-bug-meeting-presentation-fall-2019/

Nov 20:  Cedar Warman (John Fowler Lab, Botany & Plant Pathology)

  • Title: High-throughput maize ear phenotyping with a custom-built scanner and machine learning seed detection, i.e., Computer counts corn, correctly.
  • Abstract: Near-incomprehensible amounts of maize are produced each year, but our understanding of the dominant North American crop is fundamentally incomplete. Of particular interest is the seed-producing structure of maize, the ear. Here, we present a novel maize ear phenotyping system. Our system captures a video of a rotating ear, which is subsequently flattened into a projection of the ear’s surface. Seed positions and genetic markers can be quantified manually from this projection. To increase throughput, we applied deep learning-based computer vision approaches to seed and marker quantification. Our progress towards a completely automated phenotyping system will be described, in addition to challenges we continue to face adapting computer vision technology to maize ears.
  • Links from Cedar’s presentation:
  • Movie flattening: github.com/fowler-lab-osu/flatten_all_videos_in_pwd
  • Seed distribution analysis: github.com/vischulisem/Maize_Scanner
  • Also here’s a preprint describing the scanner: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/780650v2

Dec 4: Christina Mulch (Kelly Vining Lab, Horticulture)

  • Title: IsoSeq pooling and HiSeq multiplexing comparison for Rubus occidentalis samples to explore Aphid resistance, i.e., Utilizing RNA to find differences between Aphid Resistant and Susceptible plants.
  • Abstract: Black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) is a small specialty crop produced primarily in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S. A major challenge for its success is Black raspberry necrosis virus vectored by the Large Raspberry Aphid (Amphorophora agathonica A.). We used Pacific Biosciences IsoSeq long read sequencing technology to study the gene expression patterns in leaves following aphid inoculation. We collected samples from a segregating population for resistance to the pest. High quality RNA was extracted from 20 samples, 10 resistant (R) and 10 susceptible (S) using a modified RNA extraction protocol. Data processing was preformed using the IsoSeq3 pipeline. Alignment of each R and S pool to the latest chromosome level black raspberry reference genome used minimap2 according to recommended options for IsoSeq. Reads were filtered based on mapping quality, alignment length, and presence or absence in multiple samples. This study seeks to reveal the genetic underpinning of aphid resistance with the ultimate goal of enabling marker assisted selection.

Thank you for attending and we look forward to seeing you in 2020!

All of the slots for winter 2020 are full, but please contact us if you’re interested in presenting in the future.

The CGRB will be offering three different workshops this fall. For more information and to register, see the CGRB website.

All workshops are available for credit for students or available to non-students as non-credit workshop(s).

To give perspective students a better insight on each course, we’ve conducted short interviews with the instructors about their course.

See course descriptions and the interviews with the instructors below!


Courses Offered:

Introduction to Unix/Linux and Command-Line Data Analysis (2 modules x 5 weeks @ 2 hrs per week)

Instructor: Matthew Peterson

Course Description:

Introduction to Unix/Linux (5 weeks @ 2 hrs per week)

Logistics:
Date & Time:
Sep 25 – Oct 23, Mon/Wed 2:00pm – 2:50pm
For credit: BDS599 CRN 20579
Workshop Cost: $250


This module introduces the natural environment of bioinformatics: the Linux command line. Material will cover logging into remote machines, filesystem organization and file manipulation, and installing and using software (including examples such as HMMER, BLAST, and MUSCLE). Finally, we introduce the CGRB research infrastructure (including submitting batch jobs) and concepts for data analysis on the command line with tools such as grep and wc.

Command-Line Data Analysis (5 weeks @ 2 hrs per week)

Logistics:
Date & Time: Nov 4  – Dec 4, Mon/Wed, 2:00pm – 2:50pm
For credit: BDS599 CRN 20580
Workshop Cost: $250


The Linux command-line environment has long been used for analyzing text-based and scientific data, and there are a large number of tools pre-installed for data analysis. These can be chained together to form powerful pipelines. Material will cover these and related tools (including grep, sort, awk, sed, etc.) driven by examples of biological data in a problem-solving context that introduces programmatic thinking. This module also covers regular expressions, a useful syntax for matching and substituting string and sequence data.

Matthew Peterson in the CGRB server room

Q1: What do you hope students gain from this workshop?

My hope is that students come to appreciate the power and flexibility of using the text-based command-line interface to interact with (Linux) computational infrastructures. With practice students will become self-sufficient in utilizing the infrastructure to conduct their own research.

Q2: Favorite topic in your course?

Pipelines! The ability to chain the inputs and outputs of multiple commands to filter data is immensely powerful.

Q3: Who should register for this course?

From the first page of the course syllabus: “Linux/Unix Commands, Bioinformatics Utilities, Computational Infrastructure: If you know nothing about the above, then you are exactly in the right course! WELCOME!”

Q4: Advice for users new to bioinformatics and/or programming?

Practice, practice, practice! Learning how to use the command-line effectively is like making a clay pot, you need to get your hands dirty!


RNA-Sequencing (10 weeks @ 2 hrs per week)

Instructor: Dr. Andrew Black

Course Description:

Logistics:
Date & Time: Sept 25 – Dec 5, Tue/Thur 11:00am – 11:50am
For credit: BDS 599, CRN 20581
Workshop Cost: $500

This course provides an introduction to, and practical experience with, the computational component of bulk-RNA-sequencing. After a general overview, participants will obtain a working introduction to command line, R-studio, and accessing and utilizing a computing infrastructure. Students with then work through a series of exercises cleaning raw FASTQ files, aligning reads to a reference genome, quasi-mapping reads to a transcriptome / de novo assembly, followed by data visualization and Differential Gene Expression analysis.

Dr. Andrew Black will teach the RNA-seq workshop this term.

Q1: What do you hope students gain from this workshop?

I hope that students gain an understanding of the computational workflow involved with RNA-seq and an appreciation of the methodology! My overarching goal with this course is that people can use material from this course as scaffolding for analyzing their own data on the CGRB infrastructure.

Q2: Favorite topic in your course?

I added a lord of the rings theme to my course; students are looking for differentially expressed genes between hobbits and golems. I’m a dork, I know, but I had fun spiking different genes into the data and enjoy having students visualize this.

Q3: Who should register for this course?

Graduate students, postdocs, faculty, or anyone outside of OSU that are interested in receiving an introduction to RNA-seq or for those that are needing to learn the workflow for their own project(s).

Q4: Advice for users new to bioinformatics and/or programming?

Take it one step at a time and get comfortable with several commands before expanding your scope. Also, record your commands / code in a text document, because if you aren’t using it on a daily basis, you’ll forget it!


Data Programming in R (6 weeks @ 3 hrs per week)

Instructor: Dr. Shawn O’Neil

Logistics:
Date & Time: Sept. 25 – Nov. 6, Mon/Weds/Fri 9:00am – 9:50am
For credit: ST 599, CRN 17196
Workshop Cost: $500


The R programming language is widely used for the analysis of statistical data sets. This course introduces the language from a computer science perspective, covering topics such as basic data types (e.g. integers, numerics, characters, vectors, lists, matrices, and data frames), importing and manipulating data (in particular, vector and data-frame indexing), control flow (loops, conditionals, and functions), and good practices for producing readable, reusable, and efficient R code. We’ll also explore functional programming concepts and the powerful data manipulation and visualization packages dplyr and tidyr, and ggplot2.

Q1: What do you hope students gain from this workshop?

I really hope that students gain an appreciation for programming as a creative activity. It’s not just a means to an end, even with a statistical language like R; there’s a lot of room for play and exploration. Simulation, for example, is a great way to explore complex systems and ask ‘what if’ questions. Many languages (including R) support programmatic drawing and data visualization which can be quite fun.

Q2: Favorite topic in your course?

I always enjoy the point when we first start scaling analyses to thousands of statistical tests. It’s an eye-opening moment, and doing so in R introduces ‘functional programming,’ a powerful and increasingly important paradigm for software design. 

Q3: Who should register for this course?

Anyone who is interested in doing data analysis, especially of a statistical sort. For those interested in learning programming in a broader sense, our winter Intro to Python series is an excellent overview of fundamental concepts. Although we cover the same topics in the R course, R organizes its features differently than most mainstream programming languages like Python, Java, and C++. Learning both Python and R provides a solid foundation for data science!

Q4: Advice for users new to bioinformatics and/or programming?

I do recommend learning more than one programming language, eventually, as this helps separate deeper concepts from syntax. Find what motivates you and explore it via programming — this could be your primary research project, some field you’ve been wanting to learn more about, or even a hobby. 


This blog post was originally published on September 10, 2018 and written by Christopher M. Sullivan, Assistant Director for Biocomputing. Read the whole article here.

The Oregon State University’s Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing (CGRB) and the Plankton Ecology Lab at OSU Hatfield have been collaborating in implementing an image processing pipeline to automate the classification of in situ images of plankton: microscopic organisms at the base of the food web in the world’s oceans and freshwater ecosystems. The imagery collection from a 10-day cruise typically contains approximately 80 TB worth of video, which, in some cases, may convert into image data yielding several billions of segments representing individual plankton and particles that need to be identified; a near impossible task to carry out manually by human experts. While we have a fully functional Convolutional Neural Net (CNN) algorithm that does an excellent job at predicting the identity of the plankton organisms or particles, we have been limited by GPU computational capabilities. We started working with PCI bus based Tesla K40 and K80 GPUs, which were good enough to manage millions of segments. However, when it came to billions of segments, it became a near insurmountable challenge.

Continue reading

R’s default print function for data frames and matrices is not an effective way to display the contents, especially in a html report. RStudio created a R package, DT, that is an interface to the JavaScript library DataTable. DT allows users to have interactive tables that includes searching, sorting, filtering and exporting! I routinely use these tables in my analysis reports.

Install the DT package from cran

First, one must install and load the DT package. Open up RStudio and run the following commands to install and load the DT package:

# Install the DT package
install.packages("DT")
# Load the DT package
library(DT)

Example Table

The print function is not the most effective was to display a table in an HTML R Markdown report.

print(head(mtcars))
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-10-1024x252.png

Now let’s look at the datatable function for comparison. The input to the datatable function is a data frame or matrix. Let’s make a table with the preloaded iris data that’s in a data.frame. The basic call is DT::datatable(iris) but in our example I’ve added the filter option to the top of the table, and limited the number of entries to 5 per table. See code and table features below:

datatable(iris, filter = "top", 
          options = list(pageLength = 5))

A screen shot of the output looks like:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-1024x490.png

Already, the readability is much better than the base r function print. This is a JavaScript based table, stored in a HTML widget, so a flat image doesn’t convey all of the interactive features.

Features

NUMBER OF ENTRIES TO DISPLAY

You’ll notice that there is a drop down menu that says: “Show 5 entries”. The default is 10, but I specified 5 as default with the code pageLength=5. One may select the number of entries to show by using the drop down menu like so:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-1.png

SEARCH BAR

The widget also includes a search bar on the top right corner which can be very useful when interactively exploring data. Note at the bottom of the table it shows you how many entries (rows) were found and are being displayed.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-2.png
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-3-1024x58.png

SORT COLUMNS

Notice that to the right of each column name are two arrows: One may sort by ascending or descending order and the direction of the blue arrow indicates by which direction you sorted the column.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-6.png

FILTER COLUMNS

The datatable function also allows users to filter each column depending on the datatype: filter numeric columns with a slider & filter columns of class factor with a drop down menu. One must add the filter = "top" (or bottom, etc.) to the code to enable this feature.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-7.png
Numeric columns have sliders
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-8.png
Columns of class factor have a drop down menu

Export Data

Another useful aspect of the datatable function is the “Buttons” extension. This enables users to copy the table, save as a csv, excel or PDF file, or print the table. The table “remembers” what you’ve changed so far—so if you sort by Sepal Length, filter pedal width to > 1 and select species “versicolor” the copied/saved table will have these same restrictions.

datatable(iris, 
          extensions = 'Buttons',
          options = list(dom = 'Bfrtip', 
                         buttons = c('copy', 'csv', 'excel', 'pdf', 'print'))

The above code adds “buttons” to the top of the table like so:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-9.png

If one clicks “copy”, the table will be copied to your clipboard, “CSV” or “PDF” will save the table to the give file type, and “print” will bring put the table into a print friendly format and will bring up the print dialog box.

Links and Color

One may also have links in their table. Say you made a data frame with links you want to work in your html report. For example: a data frame of variants w/ links to their position in a genome browser. This is done through not escaping content in the table, specifically the column with the links. The links are made with html and must not be escaped to show up. This applies to other html as well; including color. For me, it was confusing that I had to not escape the html columns. Got it completely backwards the first time I tried it. NOTE: > got replaced with “& gt;” (with no spaces) when it is rendered on the blog… Need to find a fix!

# Make dataframe
df.link <- data.frame(school=c("OSU", "UO", "Linfield", "Willamette"), 
                      mascot=c("beavers", "ducks", "wildcats", "bearcats"),
                      website=c('<a href="http://oregonstate.edu/">oregonstate.edu</a>',
                                '<a href="https://www.uoregon.edu/">uoregon.edu</a>',
                                '<a href="https://www.linfield.edu/">linfield.edu</a>',
                                '<a href="https://www.willamette.edu/">willamette.edu</a>'),
                      School_colors=c('<span style="color:orange">orange & black</span>', 
                                        '<span style="color:green">green & yellow</span>', 
                                        '<span style="color:purple">purple and red</span>', 
                                        '<span style="color:red">red and yellow</span>'))

# When the html columns, 3 & 4, are not escaped, it works!
datatable(df.link, escape = c(1,2,3))
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-11-1024x333.png

Column Visibility

One may also hide columns from visibility and add a button to add the column back interactively. For example, say we have a data frame called sv.all.i.in. We can hide columns 3 and 4, which are long sequences and disrupt the readability of the table, with the following code:

datatable(sv.all.i.in, extensions = 'Buttons',
          options = list(dom = 'Bfrtip', columnDefs = list(list(visible=FALSE, targets=c(3,4))), 
                         buttons = list(I('colvis'),c('copy', 'csv', 'excel', 'pdf', 'print'))))
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-12.png

Learn More

There are many more useful features that you can add to your datatable! Learn more here: https://rstudio.github.io/DT/

Friday, September 12, 2014

Poster Award Winners

PostDoc/Trainer/Faculty: Venkatesh Moktali, FungiDB: a functional genomic resource for fungal & oomycete organisms
Grad student: Rachael C. Kuintzle, RNA-Seq Reveals Age-Induced Changes in Rhythmicity in Drosophila Transcriptome
Undergrad student: Alvin Yu, Identifying candidate drugs for atherosclerosis prevention or treatment through a systems biology approach to drug repurposing

Program

8:00Registration & refreshments (Poster & sponsor setup) 
9:00Brett Tyler, Director, CGRB
Introduction, CGRB update
9:20Shawn O’Neil, Adelaide Rhodes and Kelly Vining, CGRB
CGRB Bioinformatics Training: We can help!
  Moderator: Thomas Wolpert
9:30Sheng-Yang He, Michigan State University
Bacterial pathogenesis as a probe of plant biology
10:15Niklaus J. Grünwald, USDA –ARS/Botany & Plant Pathology
Inferring pattern and process of emergence in Phytophthora pathogens
10:40Break (Poster & sponsor setup)
11:10Ryan Mueller, Microbiology
Linking phylogenetic identity and biogeochemical function of uncultivated marine microbes with novel mass spectrometry techniques
[Joyce Loper introduces C. Whistler]
11:35Cheryl Whistler, University of New Hampshire
Barbarians at the gate: Adaptive evolution of squid-naive Vibrio fischeri to light organ symbiosis
12:20Lunch (Poster and Sponsor setups / displays)
  Moderator: Siva Kolluri
1:35Michael Banks, Cooperative Institute for Marine Resource Studies (CIMRS)
Enigmas Related to the Ocean Migration of Chinook Salmon
2:00Justin Sanders, Microbiology
Development of a novel vertebrate model for the cosmopolitan parasite, Toxoplasma gondii
2:25Patrick De Leenheer, Mathematics/Integrative Biology
On finding hotspots and sinks in a multipatch malaria model
2:50Break (Poster and Sponsor setups / displays)
3:15Prasad Kopparapu, Environmental & Molecular Toxicology
Fighting Cancer with its own tools
3:40William Bisson, Environmental & Molecular Toxicology
Computer-aided cancer drug discovery and chemoprevention in the postgenomic era
4:05Shankar Subramaniam, University of California – San Diego
The Impact of “Omics” on Systems Medicine
4:50Ron Adams, Interim Vice President of Research
Closing remarks
5:00Poster Session/Reception, Sponsor Displays