The Colegio César Chávez exhibit was featured at part of the March 2, 2026, Farm Worker Solidarity Summit hosted by the University of Oregon’s Multicultural Center. The event was a celebration of historical and current day contributions that farm workers make to not only Oregon’s economy but our culture as Oregonians. The stories shared through this celebration are more important than ever to understanding and depicting the challenges that domestic and immigrant farm workers face today. Students, faculty/staff, and community members were invited to engage in these conversations.
Farm Worker Solidarity Summit Story Sharing Sessions
Workshop Session 1 (Film and Discussion and Exhibit): Colegio César Chávez — Moderator Natalia Fernández with panelists José Romero, Anthony Veliz, & Alicia Avila
Session 2 (Presentation & Exhibit): “Stories from the Farm Workers’ Rights Movement” with focus on UFW, EFFW in the community and on campus — speaker Nancy Bray, Eugene Friends of the Farm Workers
Workshop Session 3 (Presentation): “The Power of the Boycott: Windmill Mushroom Boycott” — speaker Collin Heatley, UO PhD Student, History
Springfield High School Mariachi del Sol Performance
Keynote by PCUN President Reyna Lopez
To begin the event, summit organizer Dinorah Ortiz-Carté, Program Director, University of Oregon Multicultural and SSWANA Centers, shared the UO’s land acknowledgement as well as a labor acknowledgement:
University of Oregon Labor Acknowledgement
Colegio César Chávez: Film Screening, Panel Discussion, and Exhibit
The session “The Living Legacy of Colegio César Chávez” included a screening of OPB’s Oregon Experience documentary “The Living Legacy of Colegio César Chávez” and was followed by a panel discussion with documentary producer Alicia Avila, Colegio César Chávez co-founder José Romero, and PODER: Oregon’s Latino Leadership Network President Anthony Veliz. “Colegio César Chávez: The Legacy Lives On / El legado sigue vivo” exhibition curator, Natalia Fernández moderated the panel discussion. The speakers shared their thoughts on the history and legacy of the Colegio César Chávez and the need for continued advocacy for educational opportunities for the Latino/a/é community. About 30 people were in attendance for the session.
The questions posed to the panelists included: What are some lessons learned from Colegio’s community organizing experiences that continue to be applicable today? Can you share the importance of mentors and how your mentors helped shape you and your advocacy work? How can we continue to center the need for educational opportunities for the Latiné community?
Photo of the Panelists, photo by Arya Surowidjojo / OPB
Springfield High School Mariachi del Sol Performance
Springfield High School Mariachi del Sol
Springfield High School Mariachi del Sol
Keynote Speech by PCUN President Reyna Lopez
Flyer to promote the keynote speech by PCUN President Reyna Lopez
The Summit concluded with a keynote speech by PCUN President Reyna Lopez. PCUN is the largest Latinx organization in Oregon and has been on the forefront of fighting detention and deportation of immigrants and farm workers across the state.
Lopez spoke about the work PCUN is engaging in to support immigrant communities and the fight against ICE. She shared information about the history of May Day and PCUN’s plans for Day without an Immigrant events as well as May Day 2026 and how folks can get involved!
Dates for the Day without an Immigrant and May Day events in 2026
Solidarity in Action: Boycott Windmill Mushroom products!
Current and former workers from the Windmill Mushroom Farms in Sunnyside, WA rallied to formally announce a UFW boycott of Windmill Mushroom products. One of the three sessions shared information about the boycott and how community members can support the farm workers involved and impacted:
Information about the boycott of Windmill Mushroom products
Boycott Windmill Mushroom Farms: Ways to Support
For over three years, workers at a mushroom facility in Sunnyside, WA, run by Windmill Mushroom Farms and owned by private equity firm Instar, have been fighting for union recognition. Under Washington State Law, agricultural workers are excluded from the right to organize and there is no legal mechanism to force companies to recognize labor unions regardless of the wishes of a majority of the workforce. Many pro-union workers at Windmill Mushrooms have faced adverse actions, including terminations and conditions that have pressured them to leave their jobs. After repeated demonstrations, petitions, and other demands for union recognition, the United Farm Workers in December, 2024 announced its first official boycott of the decade against Windmill Mushrooms, until the company agrees to recognize the union.
On Aug. 15, 2025, the UFW and PCUN announced the expansion of the boycott into Oregon. Windmill mushrooms are sold at Safeway, Albertsons, Fred Meyer, WinCo and Market of Choice in Eugene/Springfield. They are often sold bulk and include organic varieties so check the box label before buying. If the box has no label, ask the produce manager what brand they are. Organically Grown doesn’t buy from Windmill Farms so any mushrooms sold in natural food stores in Eugene are OK to buy.
Actions for individuals and organizations:
1) Don’t buy Windmill mushrooms or any mushrooms grown in Sunnyside, WA 2) Sign the petition to Instar: https://act.seiu.org/a/windmill_instar and ask your friends to sign as well 3) Tell your friends about the boycott and ask them to sign the petition 4) Ask organizations in which you are a member to endorse the boycott – contact Eugene Friends of the Farm Workers for information and sample endorsement statements 5) Check if Windmill mushrooms are sold at other grocery stores in the area and let us know 6) If you would like to get more involved in Farm Worker Rights and the Windmill mushroom boycott, contact Eugene Friends of the Farm Workers: braynj@gmail.com
During fall term 2025, College of Education instructor Carrie Pilmer reached out to Natalia Fernández to develop an activity using archival materials for her ED219: Social Justice, Civil Rights, & Multiculturalism in Education course. In winter term 2026, SCARC hosted a total of 170 ED 219 students (2 sections of the course) in the SCARC Reading Room to engage with materials from the OSU Difference, Power, and Discrimination Program Records (note: the program is now called Difference, Power, and Oppression).
The purpose of ED 219 is to examine equity and injustice based on socially constructed groupings such as race, gender, language, religion, class and ability through history and current times. The course explores asset-based approaches and power in systems and institutions of society (e.g., schooling, curriculum, educational policy) and how to actively make change. The course emphasizes self-inquiry and contemplation of multiculturalism and personal experiences through a resilience-focused wholeness approach.
ED 219 is a Difference, Power, and Oppression (DPO) designated course. It fulfills the requirement to engage students in the critical reflection on the complexity of the structures, institutions, and ideologies that sustain systemic oppression, discrimination, and the inequitable distribution of systemic power and resources within and across communities. Such examinations enhance and promote responsible, ethical, and anti-racist engagement by preparing students to understand and disrupt these systems as they manifest in their field.
Because of the DPO requirement fulfillment and the course’s subject matter – the history of education – Carrie and Natalia decided to use the history of the DPO program as a local history case study for the students to analyze. Even better, because the spark for establishment of the DPO was BIPOC student activism, Natalia and Carrie wanted to emphasize the power of student voices to create change at OSU.
In addition to Carrie’s course, we invited Ana Ramírez’s course section as well, and during week four of the winter term, SCARC hosted four sessions (the two classes were split into two groups) of ED 219 students.
The College of Education wrote a piece about the collaboration; that article and accompanying photos are included below!
Ana M. Ramírez, M.Ed. (she/her/ella), Education Instructor, College of Education Natalia Fernández, SCARC and Ana Ramírez, College of EducationDPD Records, archival collection boxes
Do you know how the Difference, Power, and Oppression program was created at Oregon State? In Ana Ramírez’s ED 219 class, students explored the rich history of student organizing that led to the DPO program and other institutional changes.
Instructors Ana Ramírez and Carrie Pilmer collaborated with Natalia Fernández, Curator of the Oregon Multicultural Archives and the OSU Queer Archives, to bring students to the Special Collections and Archives Research Center. The class worked with primary source documents to learn about the history of the DPO Program and participated in group discussions, sharing their thoughts on the role of student voices in shaping coursework and their campus.
The class found the archive activity to be engaging and came to a strong consensus that it should be included in the course going forward. Student Waleed shares, “The archival materials made these experiences feel real, not just theoretical. It helped me understand that the struggles were ongoing and that change only happened when students spoke up and organized together.”
Several students noted that it was powerful to hear student voices directly from the source. When asked about the most impactful part of the activity, Molly says, “the proposal from the students felt the most impactful to me because I can only imagine the amount of courage and strength it took for these students to speak up. It also shows how something such as a letter or proposal can snowball into a whole new program that creates change for generations.”
Many also remarked that it was interesting to examine history and civil rights from a local perspective—that it was especially engaging to learn about this history of their university in particular. Student Aubrey says, “The large group discussion we had at the end of today’s class in the Archives really helped me tie in how we can learn from past OSU student activism and use it in a real, modern day context. Hearing my peers explain in their own words how we need to take ownership over issues at OSU helped me grasp the concept of real student activism, and in some ways even inspired me.” The class drew connections between the primary source accounts and current political and social issues.
The trip to the Special Collections and Archives Research Center proved to be a success and fulfilled Ramírez’s goals for the activity. She tells us, “We wanted our students to be engaging directly with the archival materials on the history of the DPO Program at OSU. We facilitated helping them see student activism, institutional change, and historical memory as central to their academic journey—not abstract concepts, but lived and ongoing commitments.
Special thanks to Natalia Fernández and the OSU Libraries Special Collections for this opportunity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And, the article was shared across multiple outreach platforms!
Photo of the archival materials table with the event presentation in the background
The OSU Libraries, in collaboration with SCARC, hosted its first Transcribe-a-Thon Event via the From the Page platform!
What is a Transcribe-a-Thon Event? An opportunity to engage in transcription work, together and in-person!
What is From the Page?From The Page is a crowdsourcing transcription platform that allows archival institutions to post documents for transcription. While AI tools can be used for transcription purposes, some documents require human review to meet best practices for transcription for remediation purposes.
OSU’s SCARC has a number of projects available via From The Page: OSU SCARC for anyone to work on online from the ease and comfort of their own computers. In January 2026, we decided to host an event to engage in this work in-person with some selected materials for a special Transcribe the Archives milestone project.
What is the Transcribe the Archives milestone project? We want our archives to be open to all, which means we need help from our community members! We have been transcribing our archival materials so that the documents are searchable and screen reader-accessible. As a special pilot project for hosting in-person events, we selected materials from our Underground Newspapers collection that needed human transcribers (and at the time of the event, was almost completely transcribed) and planned an in-person event to see how many pages we could transcribe and review in a couple hours to get us that much closer to completing the project.
About the Underground Newspapers collection: The Underground Newspapers collection consist of publications, primarily written and produced by Oregon State University students, that were intended as alternatives to the mainstream press. Most of the publications were issued during the period of student unrest in the 1960s and early 1970s. The predominant topics are civil rights, specifically racial incidents at Oregon State University, and the war in Vietnam. All of the items in this collection are available online in the Oregon State University Student Protest and Underground Publications digital collection.
About the Transcribe-a-Thon Event: The event took place noon to 2 p.m., Monday Jan. 20th in the Valley Library’s Autzen classroom. All were welcome and we provided all the training needed as part of the event.
Over the course of the 2 hours we had 8 people (1 community member, 1 student, and 5 faculty/staff) join us. Participants were encouraged to work on documents within the OSU Student Protest and Underground Publications, but were able to work on any OSU materials in need of transcription, and over the course of the two hours, 91 pages were transcribed!
Transcription by Humans vs AI Tools
Original Document: image of The Scab SheetAI Output: image of The Scab SheetHuman-Transcribed Output: image of The Scab Sheet
Do you want to work on this project with us? Please do!
Instructions for engaging in a From the Page project
Photos from the Event
Event welcome table and whiteboard to tally participants Pins! The “I can read cursive” pins were especially cute!Archival materials table: items from the Underground Newspapers collectionSelection of materials from the Underground Newspapers collection: The Scab SheetTranscribers hard at work!
OUR NEXT TRANSCRIBE-A-THON EVENT!
Transcribe the Archives: Happy Birthday, Linus Pauling! Feb 27, Friday 1 – 3 p.m. @ Autzen Classroom
Happy birthday, Linus Pauling! Help make our archives accessible by transcribing his notes and journals. All are welcome!
During fall term 2025, SCARC collaborated with Dr. Dwaine Plaza’s course SOC 318 Qualitative Research Methods on an assignment for students to conduct oral history interviews with Oregon State University Faculty and administrators. Early in the term, the students came for an instruction session held in the SCARC Reading Room and we shared the SCARC resource Oral History Interviewing Methods & Project Management. We now have 6 new oral history interviews available for public access!
During winter term 2025 Dr. Kara Ritzheimer’s History 310 (Historian’s Craft) students researched and wrote blog posts about OSU during WWII. The sources they consulted are listed at the end of each post. Students wrote on a variety of topics and we hope you appreciate their contributions as much as the staff at SCARC does!
Blog post written by Tanner Maynard.
The December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor by the Imperial Japanese Navy forced the American people to recognize that the war raging across the globe was coming to them, whether they wanted it or not. Men stood in recruitment lines, women signed up for the Red Cross, and assembly lines transitioned from producing cars to producing tanks. The attacks galvanized the nation’s fighting spirt and Americans were once again willing to enter the fray. However, the war overseas would not be won through spirit alone. It had been more than two decades since the United States’ foray into World War One and Americans were not accustomed to, nor prepared for, the rigors of war. Technicians needed training, communities needed organizing, and those on the home front needed more practical knowledge to support the war abroad. Land-grant universities like Oregon State College (OSC) answered the nation’s call to arms by addressing the country’s educational needs.
America faced a critical shortage of engineers, doctors, and scientists for wartime needs at the onset of the United States’ entry into World War Two. In recognition of this shortage, the OSC campus almost immediately began to transition from traditional campus life towards a wartime curriculum. A headline from the March 1942 issue of The Oregon Stater, the campus’s monthly magazine, reads: “Wartime Demands Anticipated…Defense Activities at Oregon State College Meet and Exceed Suggestions of Wartime Commission.”[1] The article states that, earlier that month, under the direction of acting president Dr. F.A. Gilfillan, OSC had committed to accelerate academic schedules. College administrators planned summer classes for the upcoming term that would offer up to a maximum of 18 credits for the session and allow undergraduates in critical sectors, such as engineering and physics, to graduate earlier. OSC also contributed to the war effort by creating nutritional programs, pre-nursing courses, first aid, fire prevention training, and additional ROTC work.[2] While many of these courses were educational, the newly established physical program, for example, offered dancing classes, field games, and swimming courses, all under the supervision of OSC physical education staff.[3]
OSC was one of the first campuses in the nation to offer physical conditioning courses aimed at national defense for women.[4] While these courses were not designed to prepare women for physical combat, they were intended to condition who would go on to work in canneries, field labor, or at aid stations through the course of the war, as the Oregon State Barometer explains.[5]
By 1943, the accelerated wartime curriculum began to accommodate incoming undergraduates who participated in the similar high school Victory Corps program. The program was designed to provide some basic military training to male and female high school students. Undergraduates would be eligible to transfer their Victory Corps experience over in the form of degree credits to further accelerate their graduation date and meet the expertise required of the war.[6] Summer classes and Victory Corps workshops could give freshmen a head start on their graduation date. The wartime curriculum prepared students for their future trials. However, OSC did not just offer curriculum for its own students.
The military quickly realized its direct need for technical expertise beyond the home front. In 1943, the Army and Navy collaborated to create the Army Specialized Training Program (ASTP) under the Ninth Service Command. The Service Command’s intent was to train officers in subjects such as advanced engineering and other sciences. Qualified civilians, such as campus faculty, would conduct this training on a contract basis. OSC was the first institution on the West Coast to secure one of these contracts.[7] Oregon newspapers quickly praised OSC for accepting 500 soldiers in the coming spring term of 1943.[8] The ASTP required the soldier students to adhere to rigorous military and professional standards. An ASTP manual sent to the OSC President details the contracted curriculum the campus would provide, as well as the advanced expectations of those who participate in the program.[9] The program would not survive the end of the war due to more pressing manpower requirements, such a need for riflemen in late 1943 and early 1944. However, OSC continued to support the program, with contracts extending as far as July 1945.[10] Wartime curricula and the ASTP, while significant presences on the campus, were not the only educational programs offered by OSC in support of the war.
President Roosevelt’s administration confronted a monumental task in mobilizing the American people and the economy for war. In his historical analysis Wartime America, historian Dr. John Jeffries describes the complexities of mobilization and how the executive branch created various organizations to assist in that endeavor. “America’s entry into the war in December 1941 galvanized mobilization agencies, the production of war goods, and the management of the economy, but largely along lines already established. In January 1942, FDR created the War Production Board (WPB)…Designed to exercise general responsibility over the economy in order to effect conversion to war production, restrict nonessential economic activity, and coordinate materials and production priorities.”[11] By themselves, these programs would mean relatively little if the public did not know how to help support them in their day-to-day lives. You may ask an individual to do their part to control inflation, but it will not amount to much if people don’t know what that is or how they can make an impact. Luckily, OSC was well-equipped for educational outreach.
Extension Services offered by land-grant universities and colleges like OSC had a long tradition of educational outreach long before, and long after, the entry to the war. Dr. Wayne Rasmussen, former chief historian for the United States Department of Agriculture, remarked in his historical account Taking the University to the People, “Extension has been a force for sustained, rational change that improves the quality of American life. It has taken the university to the people. Indeed, it is the university of the people.”[12] He adds, “the Extension Services played pivotal roles in the nation’s survival through three major emergencies – World War I, the Great Depression of the 1930s, and World War II.”[13]
While OSC’s wartime curriculum met the educational needs of the nation on campus, its Extension Service stood ready to address them off grounds. Extension Services outreach ranged from providing practical information to local communities in support of national programs, such as the effort to control inflation, to indirect support through comprehensive diet plans and fire prevention training.
Handbooks were particularly useful to this end. One such example is the Victory Begins at Home program booklet in which OSC’s Extension Services developed a guide to assist local leaders in supporting national goals.[14] The manual emphasized the need for community leaders to keep their neighborhood informed about wartime problems as well as activities that local communities could engage in, such as the collection of scrap iron and rubber or the establishment of Victory Gardens. Nutrition became a major focus of the war effort during 1942 and 1943. Establishing home food supplies and maintaining proper nutrition would allow families to be more resilient in the face of wartime shortages. In response, Extension Services distributed material to assist families in developing easy to follow diet plans.[15] Families received detailed instructions via guidebooks and workshops on how to keep and properly manage livestock, even in confined environments.[16] The potential threat of fire sabotage by enemy forces spurred the creation of the Emergency Farm Fire Protection program in support of the national Victory Garden initiative.[17] OSC’s Extension Services not only developed these types of programs, but ensured community access via the distribution of handbooks to local communities through meetings, workshops, or mailing lists.[18] OSC’s fire prevention and training programs were so successful that in 1942, the state organized the Keeping Oregon Green association. A 1942 thesis presented to the School of Forestry noted that the recent expansion of fire patrols in rural Oregon were directly attributable to the Oregon State College Extension Service.[19] These extra patrols would surely come in handy later that year when Japan attempted to drop incendiary bombs on the Oregon coast. However, not all programs were as tangible. In 1942, the President of the United States offered a plan to control inflation. Through workshops and booklets, Extension Services offered rural communities a comprehensive understanding of the causes of inflation, as well as tips for how individuals could assist their government in their attempts to control it.[20]
Educational institutions did not stand idly by while the rest of the nation went to war. Distributing a handbook or taking a course is not as flashy as raising a flag on a foreign island. However, that does not mean that the services offered by institutions were not valuable. Institutions like Oregon State College worked tirelessly to address the educational needs of a nation at war. Through wartime curriculum and the outreach of Extension Service, land-grant colleges directly supported the national efforts by ensuring America had the technical and practical knowledge to win the war.
[1] “Wartime Demands Anticipated…Defense Activities at Oregon State College meet and Exceed Suggestions of Wartime Commission,” The Oregon Stater, March 1942, 2, Oregon Digital, https://oregondigital.org/concern/documents/fx71bk75g
[9]“Army Specialized Training Program,” April 3, 1944, Oregon State University’s Special Collections and Archives Research Center (hereafter SCARC), President’s Office General Subject File, Army Specialized Training Program – Curricula, Contract manuals and curriculum material, 1943-1945,” Subgroup 6, Series 8, Sub-Series 41, Reel-Folder 34.79a, 215-238. Also available through, Oregon Digital, https://oregondigital.org/concern/documents/4m90dw941
It wouldn’t be the Spooky Season without an equal mix of tricks and treats. In that spirit (pun very much intended), for Taste of the ‘Chives this year I chose the September 1945 recipe from our Rationing Calendar: Liver Spoon Cakes. I’ve always enjoyed offal – what’s not to like about menudo, especially in the fall and winter months? – and thought this recipe had the potential to be unexpectedly tasty. TLDR: I was mostly wrong.
Liver Spoon Cakes
1 pound sliced liver Warm water 2 tablespoons milk 1 onion 2 eggs 6 crackers* ¼ cup lard or bacon drippings ½ teaspoon pepper 1 teaspoon salt
Simmer liver in water for 5 minutes; drain. Put through food chopper with onion and crackers. Add seasonings, milk, and beaten egg. Mix thoroughly. Drop by tablespoonfuls into hot drippings. Brown on one side. Turn and brown on second side until crisp. *We used Ritz, but Saltines would work. Both were available and widely sold in 1945 (we checked).
Reggie, our Quality Control Manager, stood ready (above) to taste most parts of the recipe to ensure freshness. While he refused to try the onions, he was very excited about the livers (below).
The recipe doesn’t call for garnishes of any kind, though it does suggest buttered noodles with mushrooms, green beans, and coleslaw to round out the plate. Basil leaf added for a bit of color (see finished product below).
Surprisingly, my Mom liked the finished product more than I did, though serving the cakes on a Ritz cracker did wonders for me. I can’t say I’d recommend making this recipe, but if you really enjoy the smell, flavor, and texture of liver, and want to give it a try, we made the following adjustments:
We cooked just half a recipe; even so we ended up with so much extra cake “batter.” If you made these as hors d’oeuvres, I would recommend a quarter recipe for 4-6 people. Also, be ready to air out your house before your guests arrive (the smell is truly awful).
We also added more crackers; for a half recipe, we ended up using a half sleeve of Ritz crackers (8-10). The batter just didn’t seem thick enough to hold together otherwise. Part of the problem could be the use of a food processor versus a “food chopper.” If the ingredients had been more roughly chopped, the batter may have been closer to meatball consistency (as opposed to pancake batter).
These cakes were likely eaten with a bite of noodles or green beans, not alone. If you decide to make them as hors d’oeuvres, consider putting them on crackers and topping with a small dollop of sour cream or creme fraiche and chives.
Overall, I’d give this recipe a two-and-a-half stars out of a possible five – despite the smell, it managed to be edible. When the chefs were polled, however, the decision was unanimous: it’s not worth making again. Our QC Manager abstained out of a conflict of interest.
The recipe below is derived from a 1945 wall calendar from Portland’s own First Federal Savings Bank that featured scads of recipes from their “Cooking Club.” We prepared some of these for our 2015 “Taste of the ‘Chives” recipe showcase and at that time, I opted to prepare Bombay Salad for our public sampling event (requiring that I secure and a break open a fresh coconut-a first for me!). This time, I went for a less adventuresome route and decided to make the spiced waffle recipe.
Spiced Waffles
2.5 cups of cake flour 3 eggs 3 teaspoons of baking powder 3 tablespoons of sugar 1 teaspoon cinnamon 3 tablespoons of butter/oil .5 teaspoon cloves 1.5 cups of milk .5 teaspoon salt
Sift together flour, baking powder, cinnamon, cloves, and salt. Beat the egg-yolks and add sugar and the butter or oil. Add milk and dry ingredients alternately to the egg-yolk mixture and fold in the egg-whites, beaten stiff. Measure the batter in a deep ladle or shallow cup. Pour on sections of well-greased waffle iron and bake approximately 20 seconds on the first side; turn and bake 40 seconds on the other side.
Pretty straightforward, though the egg yolk separation threw me a bit as this is something I’ve done maybe only once or twice before. But I managed the yolk situation well and got everything mixed just fine.
I added a dash of allspice to the mix to provide a little more depth. Otherwise, I followed the recipe to the letter (or so I thought…….). After the waffle iron heated up, I poured the mix and eventually formed maybe 14 waffles in total. And the easiest part was serving them up with maple syrup from Vermont and chowing down!
Tasty stuff, with a nice hint of spice. As my friend Susan and I devoured these, we both noticed that the consistency was a bit thick and not as fluffy as they could have been. Throughout the process, I had wondered about the separation of the egg yolks and whites, assuming that the whites were not to be used. Wrong! When I typed up the recipe for this post, I finally read the recipe thoroughly enough to understand that the whites were to be added after everything else was mixed (and not to be used to make an extra dish of scrambled eggs to accompany the waffles!) The waffles were still toothsome and worth making again, and hopefully will be even better next time when the recipe is faithfully followed!
Susan is planning to make these waffles this upcoming weekend to see how the inclusion of the egg whites changes the taste. Either way, I’m down to try them again!
Every year, SCARC hosts the “Taste of the ‘Chives” event, historically held in October during Archives Month. This event features recipes from our collections, some tasty and some not so much. The event is being moved to Winter Term to coincide with the OSU Food Drive.
But, in honor of Archives Month and as a teaser for the Taste of the ‘Chives event, we are making recipes that were featured during the 10th annual Taste of the ‘Chives in 2015.
Cream butter, gradually add sifted confectioners’ sugar and cream thoroughly. Add vanilla and sifted pastry flour. Mix well and roll out on slightly floured board to about three-eighths inch in thickness. Cut in fancy shapes with a floured cookie cutter. The dough has a tendency to fall apart and must be handled gently and quickly. Prick each shortbread with a fork, decorate with bits of candied fruits and with grains of puffed rice. Lift onto a greased cookie sheet with a pancake turner and bake in a preheated oven at 350 degrees Fahrenheit, or about thirty-five minutes. Serve with tea.
I personally love shortbread, or other not-overly-sweet cookies, with a cup of tea. Like Walker’s Shortbread or Anna’s Ginger Swedish Thins. So this recipe really appealed to me. Plus, I liked that it did not include specialized ingredients I don’t already have in my pantry or could easily substitute. I do not have pastry flour, but you can substitute two tablespoons of cornstarch and the rest with flour for each cup.
The most challenging part of this recipe was rolling the dough out to the right thickness and choosing which cutters to use. The dough was a little crumbly when I first took it out of the bowl, but it was easily mashed together before rolling. I decided to try three different cookie cutters: 1.5-inch round, cat, and bear. The recipe mentions topping with candied fruits and puffed rice. I did not have either, so I put a few sprinkles on a couple to try. I do not feel that it added much to the overall taste and texture.
The first sheet I baked for the full 35 minutes, which was a little too long. The shortbreads were brown and had, not a burned taste, but certainly a taste of being more cooked. The second sheet, I baked for about 25 minutes before checking. These came out the more golden-blond color I was wanting. Using cookie cutters that had smaller sections (tail and ears for cat, and head and legs for bear) meant those sections got a little more cooked. This wasn’t a problem, but something to be aware of in selecting shapes.
These shortbreads were delicious with a cup of tea! Whether they were hot out of the oven or room temperature, they were a nice compliment.
For those who did the math, yes we will be celebrating the 20th Taste of the ‘Chives in February 2026. We hope to see you there!
The OSU Queer Archives was delighted to collaborate with the OSU Pride Center for the Center to host the event “Add Glitter to the Archives”!
The crafternoon event “Glitter in the Archives” began in 2016 as part of Oregon Archives Month and OSU’s Queer History Month celebrations to feature copies of materials from the OSU Queer Archives to use for craft-making. It was hosted in the Special Collections and Archives Research Center’s 5th Floor Reading Room in the Valley Library from 2016-2019, and in 2023-2024, we collaborated with the Libraries’ Crafternoon series and the event was hosted in the main lobby of the Library — hence the new name “Add Glitter to the Archives.”
Hosting the event at the Pride Center was extra special because the event was an opportunity for many new students to come to the Pride Center for the first time as part of the start to the academic year. It was an event by and for the community in a safe community space. And, it was a great opportunity to get to know the Pride Center staff!
Below is the crafternoon setup featuring lots of glittery collaging supplies and copies of OSQA archival materials ~ about 12 students, plus Pride Center student staff, joined us for the event!
Event Space Set Up
Event space set up at the Pride Center
Crafting supplies, including button-makers!
Copies of archival materials available for craft-makingEvent space set up – supplies and crafting materialsNew for this year: posters the Pride Center is not retaining, and OSQA documented via photographs, were made available for crafting
Event Participants
Two event participants with crafting supplies
Three event participants reviewing crafting materials options
Two event participants crafting
Photos of some of the beautiful crafts!
Two collages made by the same artistThree collages made by the same artistButtons made by a third artist A collage made by the same artist who crafted the buttons
Be sure to visit the Pride Center!
OSU Pride Center, located at 1553 SW A Ave, Corvallis, OR 97333
SCARC’s anti-racist descriptive activities were represented by Oregon Multicultural Archives curator Natalia Fernández at the National REFORMA Conference with a poster presentation titled “Moving from Words to Actions: Anti-Racist Description Projects of Archival Materials Pertaining to Oregon’s Latinx Community History.”
About the Conference
The National REFORMA Conference is the premier training and networking event for those dedicated to library services for Latinos and Spanish-speaking communities. It is hosted by REFORMA, established in 1971 as an affiliate of the American Library Association (ALA), as a national association to promote library and information services to Latinos and the Spanish Speaking. The conference theme for this year was “Moving Forward Together: Empowering the Latino Community” and the conference took place September 18-21, 2025, in Long Beach, CA.
Poster Abstract
Archivists are actively engaging in anti-racist work, especially regarding how we describe the materials and collections we steward. This poster shares the Oregon State University Special Collections and Archives Research Center’s collaborative process for developing and completing anti-racist description projects. As examples, two projects pertaining to Oregon’s Latinx community history are featured: highlighting materials pertaining to Indigenous communities from Mexico present in the Erlinda Gonzales-Berry Papers and remediating the description for our online Braceros in Oregon Photographs collection.
Fernández spoke to 12 attendees during the 1 hour poster session to share SCARC’s work. Many attendees were not members of the special collections and archives community and were delighted and inspired that repositories across the county are engaging in anti-racist descriptive activities.
Poster as presented at the National REFORMA Conference poster session on September 20, 2025
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Highlights from the National REFORMA Conference 2025
Keynote Speaker: Maria Hinojosa
In 1992, Hinojosa launched Latino USA, “the longest-running public radio Latino news and cultural program,” and in 2010, she founded Futuro Media Group which “creates multimedia content for and about the new American mainstream in the service of empowering people to navigate the complexities of an increasingly diverse and connected world.” (from Latino USA and Future Media Group about pages)
Tour! Chicano History & REFORMA Archives
Description: Explore the REFORMA Archives and uncover Chicano history in Los Angeles. Begin at the REFORMA archives at California State University, Los Angeles, to learn about the organization’s role in preserving and advocating for Latino library services. Then, visit the Chicano Resource Center at the East Los Angeles Library, a vital hub for research on Chicano heritage and activism.
REFORMA archives at California State University, Los Angeles
California State University, Los Angeles, Special Collections and ArchivesA variety of REFORMA newslettersREFORMA newsletters from 2001-2002 featuring information about the need for mentorship within the profession and advocating for language rights nation-wideReports from the 1980s on topics still relevant to this day: the lack of representation of people of color in the library profession
The Chicano Resource Center at the East Los Angeles Library
The East Los Angeles Library
The Chicano Resource Center, external view
The Chicano Resource Center, internal view
Resources Featured During Conference Sessions
Bibliopolítica: A Digital History of the Chicano Studies Library ~ at the intersection of Chicana/o/x Studies, Digital Humanities, and Library History, this online exhibit chronicles the history of one of the first Chicana/o/x collections, the Chicano Studies Library (CSL) at the University of California, Berkeley. Viewers are invited to explore the digital exhibit, listen to recorded oral histories, browse digitized archival items, or explore on their own path.
Cinco Books ~ making available the classic and also the newest from the Spanish speaking world / acceso a las obras clásicas de la literatura del mundo hispano hablante.
Vocational Awe and Librarianship: The Lies We Tell Ourselves ~ a session partially inspired by this article which defines vocational awe as “the set of ideas, values, and assumptions librarians have about themselves and the profession that result in notions that libraries as institutions are inherently good, sacred notions, and therefore beyond critique.” The author states: “I argue that the concept of vocational awe directly correlates to problems within librarianship like burnout and low salary. This article aims to describe the phenomenon and its effects on library philosophies and practices so that they may be recognized and deconstructed.”