References

Kamal Thapa, David King, Zsuzsa Banhalmi-Zakar & Amy Diedrich (2022):
Nature-based tourism in protected areas: a systematic review of socio-economic benefits and costs to local people, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2022.2073616

Kleszczynski, Kimberly A., “Impacts of Ecotourism in Costa Rica: A Sustainable Alternative to
Conventional Tourism” (2016). Pell Scholars and Senior Theses. 106.

Pham, T. -L. (2016). Cultural, Social, and Environmental Effects of Tourism: A Case Study on Coastal Costa Rica. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_libsubv1_scholarship_submission_1481306039

What is Sustainable Tourism?

The Sustainable Tourism Framework is a structured approach designed to promote coexistence between tourism activity and local communities, with the goal of minimizing conflict and mitigating significant unfavorable effects. The framework centers on three core dimensions, environmental, socio-cultural, and economic, and examines how these elements intersect to affect the overall well-being of a destination. Environmental goes over how tourism harms the natural area and resources, socio-cultural gives a deeper understanding as to how tourism may affect the community, and economic impacts state how tourism may affect the jobs and affordability of the area. By categorizing impacts in this way, the framework enables a clearer understanding of how tourism can generate both harm and opportunity, and it supports targeted efforts to address root causes rather than symptoms. For governing bodies, this structure provides a practical tool for identifying priority areas and implementing policies, such as regulations for businesses or visitor guidelines, that protect local interests while letting tourism still exist. In the context of this project, applying the framework will help organize the analysis around the interconnected ways tourism affects both the people and natural environments of Costa Rica, ensuring that the assessment captures the full scope of its impacts.

Depletion of Culture and Community due to Tourism

With the rise of issues of outreach for resources that are necessary for the lives of the people in Costa Rica due to tourism, the attempt to get those resources has become competitive. The international tourism driver manifests through large-scale hotels whose operational demands, particularly for water to maintain amenities like golf courses during the dry season, create a pressure pathway of disproportionate extraction from shared local aquifers without adequate community consultation. The international businesses using up these resources do not share whatever profits they may receive with the community. While this slightly makes sense due to the fact there aren’t full ties between the two, this means there isn’t money to balance out the reality that resources are being used at a high rate. Profits coming first isn’t particularly new, as in a previous study it was concluded that economic benefits were more common in tourist destinations in comparison to socio-cultural benefits (Thapa et. al 7). However this continuous strain of minuscule amounts of conversation between the businesses and the communities leads to major socio-cultural consequences for the region, as stated in an article covering socio-cultural impacts in Costa Rica: “Without consultation of the community or the respective technical studies, the company chose to extract water from the aquifer in the alluvial valley for the hotel, exactly in the location where the community of Sardinal is situated… In situations like these, competition over scarce basic resources, such as clean water or electricity, spark social tension and conflict within local areas” (Kleszczynski 20). Local communities are directly affected by such adverse social effects of tourism, facing water scarcity that forces dependence on trucked deliveries while witnessing their traditional access rights diminished, with adverse implications including potential long-term community resentment toward tourism development and significant costs to residents’ quality of life and sense of local autonomy.

Another impact on the cultures of the locale from tourism is the miscommunication of the indigenous people and their history. When international tourists engage with indigenous communities through superficial visits rather than meaningful cultural exchange, their behavior functions as a tourism driver that produces lasting socio-cultural damage. This pattern typically emerges when tourists, often staying at foreign-owned hotels, make brief stops at indigenous villages as if they were just another attraction on an itinerary. The pressure pathway begins with economic leakage, tourist spending flows primarily to international tour operators and accommodations rather than reaching local hands and extends into the realm of social relations, where indigenous people are reduced to exhibits for tourist consumption. The socio-cultural consequences of this dynamic are profound: community members experience feelings of exploitation and dehumanization, traditional practices lose their authentic meaning when performed primarily for cameras, and intergenerational transmission of culture may weaken as younger community members internalize this distorted, performative version of their heritage. Indigenous communities themselves are most directly affected by these adverse social effects, facing the painful paradox of being visited yet unseen. As one Costa Rican informant observed, when tourists treat communities like museums, “this is hurting these communities. This makes these communities very closed [off], and they try to avoid tourism” (Kleszczynski 22). The adverse implications extend to both tourism and community: for residents, the psychological toll of being treated as a spectacle fosters resentment and cultural withdrawal, cutting off potential economic opportunities; for the tourism industry, the loss of authentic cultural exchange degrades the visitor experience and risks perpetuating stereotypes, ultimately undermining the sector’s long-term sustainability by alienating the very communities that give destinations their unique character.

One more harmful event that arose from tourism was when foreign residents decide to move to Costa Rica permanently but don’t make much effort to learn Spanish or become part of the local culture, it creates real friction between them and the communities they’ve moved into. The tourism driver here is a specific type of migration, expatriates and retirees, mostly from the United States, who settle down in beach towns but kind of stay in their own bubble linguistically and culturally. The pressure pathway works through this one-sided expectation: locals have to adapt by learning English and changing how they run their businesses to cater to these new residents, but there’s rarely any effort made in return. Over time, the socio-cultural consequences build up. Locals start feeling frustrated and resentful toward people who are happy to live in Costa Rica and enjoy everything it offers but won’t actually engage with the people or the culture in any meaningful way. Small business owners, shopkeepers, service workers (the people who interact with these foreign residents day in and day out) are the ones most directly affected. They end up in this exhausting position where they’re constantly adapting to accommodate people who won’t meet them halfway. As one souvenir shop owner in Jaco put it, “What really bothers me a lot is when tourists come to live here and they criticize the culture all the time, but they are living here and also there are also some people here who are not interested in learning Spanish, and they live here” (Pham 32). The implications here cut both ways. For the local community, constantly accommodating without getting anything back takes a toll. It breeds resentment and eventually people just start pulling away. For the tourism industry, having all these unassimilated foreign residents around creates visible divisions that kind of undercut the whole idea of authentic cultural exchange that draws people to Costa Rica in the first place. It ends up chipping away at the community character that made the place attractive to visitors and new residents alike.

Costs of Tourism on the Environment

Costa Rica is a highly visited tourist destination due to its unique and beautiful scenery that spans the entire country. Tourists typically go there to explore the native wildlife and the surrounding scenery. This allows tourists to invade the areas where wildlife reside more commonly, such as the national parks within Costa Rica. This engagement with the wildlife is largely encouraged because it is the main driver of what brings in more tourists. However, this engagement between humans and wildlife leads to unnatural occurrences between the two. In an article that goes over the environmental impacts of tourism in Costa Rica, an informant states, “I saw a female raccoon run beside me and stand inches from my friends and put on a cute show… I had also watched monkeys ‘smile’ for pictures and run down the beach and steal packed lunches from tourists who were busy swimming. These were very unnatural behaviors for these animals. Raccoons are naturally nocturnal, so seeing one during the day was extremely peculiar” (Kleszczynski 19). Having wild animals make changes in their instincts and daily structure is harmful to their larger populations. These animals will have to end up relying on these humans if tourism like this is continuously encouraged and provided. No population of animals can sustain entirely on humans unless domesticated, and because of that, it can lead to certain species that interact with humans more becoming endangered due to the fact that they rely on their natural instincts less.

Celeste River Waterfall, Photo by Sterling Lanier via Unsplash

Two other environmentally related impacts that are currently affecting Costa Rica are pollution and depletion of resources. They go hand in hand as they have come from the same cause. The most common buildings that derive from tourism are the hotels and resorts those traveling stay. These buildings are typically massive in size, meaning they take up many different resources, whether it is the materials required to build the resort or the large quantities of water and electricity it takes to keep it running. Having to use so much water for a singular building leaves the rest of the city with very little to use, and it isn’t just hotels using so much. In the article that goes over ecotourism in Costa Rica, it is stated, “In Guanacaste, for example, they are having huge trouble with the golf course because there are huge hotels and to have the really nice green grass, they have to water the land every single day during the dry season. And keeping the grass green during the dry season means that a lot of people in the town are not having water for six months because all the water is being used towards the golf course” (Kleszczynski 16). Water is one of the essential resources that people need, and having entire towns and cities go without it for so long just allows tourists to engage with a sport that is completely unnecessary. The same article goes over how even with ecotourism, there are issues with pollution, as well as it references, “Successful ecotourism initiatives may draw higher numbers of travelers, thus increasing negative environmental impacts such as increased solid waste generation, habitat disturbance, and forest degradation from trail erosion” (Stem, Lassoie, Lee, & Deshler, 2003). No matter how effective ecotourism may try to be, if it brings in a considerable number of people, there will be large drawbacks from the overuse of the resources, which will thus lead to more pollution, especially in the cities of Costa Rica. Although ecotourism has the environment in mind, it isn’t always perfect, and the root cause is usually just the idea of tourism in and of itself.