Recruiting Expenses and Recruiting Rankings

Following some discussion of recruiting expenditures last week, I decided to look a bit closer at some of the numbers.

The best estimate of football recruiting expenditures right now comes from the US Dept of Education site on Post-secondary education. At that site, the most recent (FY 2010) athletic scholarship are reported by gender – men’s and women’s recruiting. Since football recruiting expenses have not been reported since the Indy Star database (FY 2005), most analysts are using the men’s recruiting expenses as a proxy for football expenses. This is appropriate since football accounts for the lion share of the men’s scholarships at D-1A schools. Continue reading

Performance Analysis of OSU Football Recruiting Classes 2011

The rating values that are assigned to recruits quantify their POTENTIAL as college football players.  The final word on how successful your recruiting has been can only be ascertained after all the players in that class have completed their eligibility.  Part of my purpose in compiling this information is to get Beaver fans to talk about recruiting classes not in terms of the potential but in terms of what they’ve actually accomplished.

Tim Alexander 1998 at USC


Continue reading

Pac-10 Recruiting Rankings vs. Wins 2002-2010

The rating values (stars) that are assigned to prospective recruits quantify their POTENTIAL as college football players. A team wins with quality recruits, but coaching and player development also count for something. This marks the season for the annual hand wringing and fretting over the perceived lack of talent in OSU’s recruiting classes, so an examination of the value of recruiting rankings is warranted.
Continue reading