Login
Links
-
Recent Posts
- ICST 2017: The Theory of Composite Faults 10/12/2016
- FSE 2016: Can Testedness be Effectively Measured? 29/05/2016
- Software Quality Journal 2016: Does The Choice of Mutation Tool Matter? 08/05/2016
- ICSTW 2016: Measuring Effectiveness of Mutant Sets 08/05/2016
- ICSE 2016: On the limits of mutation reduction strategies 15/12/2015
- ISSRE 2015: How hard does mutation analysis have to be, anyway? 20/08/2015
- ASE 2015: How Verified is My Code? Falsification-Driven Verification 20/07/2015
- ESEM 2015: An empirical study of design degradation: how software projects get worse over time 20/05/2015
- ISSRE 2014: Mutations How close are they to real faults? 06/08/2014
- Sunbelt 2014: Temporal Visualization of Dynamic Collaboration Graphs of OSS Software Forks 28/01/2014
- ICSE 2014: Code Coverage for Suite Evaluation by Developers 28/01/2014
- OSS 2014: An Exploration of Factors Affecting Code Quality in FOSS Projects 20/01/2014
- OSS 2014: Drawing the Big Picture: Temporal Visualization of Dynamic Collaboration Graphs of OSS Software Forks 10/01/2014
- CHI 2014: Abandonment of Social Networks: Shift from Use to Non-Use and Experiences of Technology Non-Use 01/01/2014
- Entries 31/12/2013
Tag Archives: issre2014
ISSRE 2014: Mutations How close are they to real faults?
Mutation analysis is often used to compare the effectiveness of different test suites or testing techniques. One of the main assumptions underlying this technique is the Competent Programmer Hypothesis, which proposes that programs are very close to a correct version, … Continue reading
Posted in All, Publications
Tagged 2014, Alex Groce, Carlos Jensen, issre, issre2014, Rahul Gopinath
Leave a comment