Month: November 2024

After taking the Life Stress Inventory, Coping and Stress Management Skills Test, and Type A Personality Survey, I’ve gained valuable insights into my stress management tendencies and their potential impacts on my health and professional life. The results revealed a moderate reliance on problem focused coping strategies, scoring 62 out of 100. This indicates I often try to tackle stress head-on, addressing problems by finding solutions. While this approach is effective for controllable stressors, it can become counterproductive when dealing with uncontrollable situations. Recognizing when to let go of what I can’t change is an area for improvement. My impatience and irritability score of 47 suggests a balance between warmth and frustration in my interactions. However, it highlights moments where stress can lead to frustration, affecting relationships and possibly long-term health. Studies have linked traits like hostility and impatience to increased risks of heart disease, underscoring the importance of mindfulness and emotional regulation.

As I advance in my career, particularly as a foreman and entrepreneur, effective stress management is essential. I plan to adopt mindfulness practices such as daily meditation or breathing exercises to remain present and reduce emotional reactivity. Physical activity, especially through my CrossFit coaching and personal fitness routines, will continue to be a cornerstone of my stress relief. Additionally, setting clear boundaries to ensure work-life balance by limiting work hours and prioritizing personal time will be critical.

Organizations today recognize the importance of employee well-being in fostering productivity and retention. Many companies are implementing flexible work schedules that allow employees to balance personal and professional responsibilities. They are also offering wellness programs that include mental health support, fitness incentives, and stress management workshops.

Compensation plays a pivotal role in shaping career decisions, often serving as a key motivator in whether individuals accept a job offer, stay with their current employer, or leave for new opportunities. While financial incentives are crucial, the true impact of compensation extends beyond the paycheck, encompassing benefits, job security, and personal satisfaction.

A colleague of mine recently faced such a decision when offered a higher-paying position at a competing construction company. At first glance, the additional salary seemed like an obvious reason to switch. However, after weighing the pros and cons, they decided to stay with their current employer. The total compensation package including health benefits, retirement contributions, and a positive work culture far outweighed the allure of a higher base salary.

This decision highlights an important truth. Compensation is not just about the numbers. For many, factors like a sense of job security, alignment with organizational values, and opportunities for growth can be just as motivating as the paycheck itself.  They knew the higher salary came with uncertainties, like longer hours and less flexibility. 

This example underscores that while financial compensation is a key driver, it is rarely the only consideration. Organizations aiming to retain talent should view compensation holistically, recognizing the importance of benefits, culture, and long-term opportunities. At the same time, individuals must evaluate how different forms of compensation align with their goals and values.

Ultimately, compensation is not just about making a living, it’s about creating a fulfilling and sustainable career. Recognizing this balance can lead to better decisions, for both employees and employers alike.

Reflecting on my training experiences, I found the CrossFit Level 2 course highly beneficial, while the MEWP/aerial lift supervisor/trainer certification felt less useful, especially after recently completing OSHA 30. These two experiences highlight important principles of effective training, as discussed in this week’s lectures.

The CrossFit Level 2 course offered hands-on skill development that directly improved my coaching abilities. It built on foundational skills, with real-time feedback, practical exercises, and a strong focus on communication, movement correction, and cueing. This aligns well with the ADDIE training design model, which emphasizes analyzing participant needs, setting clear objectives, and using hands-on methods for skill transfer ​(W6 Lecture 1 – Training…). The course was structured to ensure that participants valued the experience, learned applicable skills, and could immediately use them in practice—key components of effective training according to Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model ​(W6 Lecture 2 – Evaluation).

In contrast, the MEWP/aerial lift supervisor/trainer certification felt repetitive. Since I’ve completed it multiple times, it lacked new content or depth to further my knowledge, particularly after the OSHA 30 course, which covered much of the same material. This didn’t align with the concept of adapting training to participants’ skill levels, which was covered in our onboarding and socialization lecture​(W6 Lecture 3 – Onboarding). More advanced content or safety techniques would have made this training more valuable and aligned with what I needed in my current role.

In summary, the CrossFit course stood out for its tailored, hands-on approach, and clear skill transfer, making it immediately useful. The MEWP certification, on the other hand, underscored the importance of evolving content to avoid redundancy. This comparison emphasizes how effective training is not just about covering content but ensuring that it grows with the participant’s level and meets real-world needs. 

Taking the Implicit Attitude Test (IAT) was an eye-opening experience for me, especially as a CrossFit coach who works with people of all shapes, sizes, and fitness levels. My results showed a moderate preference for thin people over fat people, revealing a subconscious bias that surprised me. As someone who believes everyone has the potential to better themselves, regardless of body type, I hadn’t consciously recognized this bias. The results align with broader trends from Project Implicit’s Weight IAT data, where 31% of respondents showed a strong preference for thin people, 28% had a moderate preference, and only 9% demonstrated any preference for fat people. This data highlights how prevalent these biases are, even among those of us who strive to treat people equitably. It also suggests that such biases can easily influence settings like hiring, where fairness and objectivity are essential.

Reflecting on this, I see how implicit bias could undermine the reliability and validity of selection processes, especially in recruitment. If hiring managers, myself included, unconsciously favor certain groups over others, it could lead to skewed assessments and cause qualified candidates to be overlooked. These biases can hinder diversity and reduce the variety of perspectives within an organization. As I’ve learned in this course, such biases are common but difficult to address without intentional strategies.

To reduce the influence of implicit bias, I believe structured interviews can be a valuable tool. By asking standardized questions to all candidates, companies can focus on objective qualifications rather than subjective impressions. Implicit bias training can also help raise awareness and encourage fairer evaluations. Another effective strategy is blind recruitment, where identifiable information is removed from résumés to prevent bias at the initial stages. By implementing these measures, we can foster a more inclusive environment and ensure a fairer hiring process. Recognizing and addressing implicit bias is essential for creating workplaces where everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed, much like the inclusive community I strive to build in my CrossFit coaching.