Categories
Uncategorized

PRIORITIZING DISCRETIONARY BENEFITS

Meeting the needs of the Millennial and Gen Z workforce, combined with addressing current social challenges facing many of these employees, were overarching considerations I chose in ranking discretionary benefits. Employers benefit by this approach through attracting and retaining a talented pool of current and future employees. 

Below is a chart showing the ranking of discretionary benefits from most likely to least likely to eliminate. Note that health insurance is not part of this discussion. With the passage of the PPAC Act in 2010, health insurance is a legally required benefit   

The four least likely discretionary benefits to eliminate serve the following purpose. First, Paid Time Off.  A specific recommendation would be to implement an Unlimited Time Off policy. This would allow greater flexibility for employees to manager their workload versus their time at work, while providing a cost savings to the employer by eliminating the liability in funding PTO accrual accounts and pay-out of unused time when employees depart the company. Investing in Retirement Programs will be continue to be important to the Millennial and Gen Z workforce. Current projections are that Social Security benefits will be fully funded until 2037. After that point, continuing taxes are expected to pay only 76% of scheduled benefits. ( ssa.gov). At that time the oldest Gen Z employees will be only 51 years old. Thus the importance for employers to invest in Retirement Programs to attract the most talented employees. The next two important discretionary benefits to maintain, Family Assistance Programs and Flexible Scheduling, help to address the specific needs of Millennial households, which often times are dual income households. Despite the increased income of dual income Millennial households (Elkins, CNBC, Jan 2019), according the recent GAO reports (gao.gov, Dec 2019) Millennial households have significantly more debt and lower median and average net worth than Generation X households at similar ages. Employers will need to provide these benefits to encourage dual income Millennial household employees to remain in the workforce, or run the risk of not having a large and diverse talent pool to draw from.   

Potential behavioral changes that may be required by employees through eliminating or reducing some employer funded discretionary benefits would be the need to purchase life insurance and/or disability insurance on the open market.

Categories
Uncategorized

Wk 5 | Person-Focused Pay

I selected Pfizer as a company to examine wanting to see if they had adopted a skilled-focused pay structure- a type of person-focused pay- for their production workforce. The hypothesis being that with the technology involved in pharmaceutical manufacturing it would be beneficial for Pfizer, and their employees, if they were trained in the production of a variety of Pfizer drugs versus specializing in just one type or a specific process. Supporting this position is recent evidence showing that companies in the manufacturing sector are adopting a skill-based pay structure.

“In one of the first comprehensive studies of skill-based pay plans, a management researcher at the University of Arkansas found that such plans are more successful and sustainable in manufacturing facilities than in service organizations. The research also revealed that support among supervisors and employees for the innovative plans consistently predicts their success and survival.”

Below is a link to the full article:

https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/3959/skill-based-pay-manufacturers

I came across an unexpected “twist” in my exploration on Pfizer’s adoption of a person-focused pay structure. The twist is why Pfizer should adopt a competency-based pay structure- another type of person-focused pay- for a different job group and reason. The position is that due to competitive threats, Pfizer should adopt a competency-based pay structure for their sales force. Many of Pfizer’s top sales performers top-out in earnings after 3 to 5 years with the company. Competitors then hire them away for higher compensation. Pfizer desires to lower the turn-over rate of high performing employees. Adopting a competency-based pay structure would encourage their sales force to acquire new skills and knowledge, allowing them to transfer within Pfizer to other functions or advancement into management. The goal is for these high performers to remain at Pfizer and develop life-long careers.*

Mark Blessington, of Mark Blessington, Inc. authored a case-study on this that can be found on his site: mark.blessington.com

I had not contemplated this benefit of a person-focused pay structure, but in this example for Pfizer it makes sense.