Females in Tech: A Look Back at ENIAC

Visiting ENIAC

At the University of Pennsylvania, 40 panels are on display from the forty ton ENIAC. The Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer announced on 1946 by the New York Times is funded by the United States military. It is so large, it fills a 30′ by 50′ room. Designed to calculate missile trajectories, it could calculate 5,000 instructions per second. For reference, the modern iPhone X weighs 0.3836 pounds and can calculate up to 600 billion instructions per second. Despite that difference in computational power, the ENIAC is very impressive for the time and later was used in the development of the hydrogen bomb. Both men and women contributed to the ENIAC, however, mostly only the men were featured in the media at that time.

Image credit: University of Pennsylvania Engineering

Readdressing History

Luckily, several institutions including the University of Pennsylvania have made efforts recently to acknowledge these women. The six most remarkable women were: Kathleen McNulty Mauchly Antonelli, Jean Jennings Bartik, Frances (Betty) Snyder Holberton, Marlyn Wescoff Meltzer, Frances Bilas Spence, and Ruth Lichterman Teitelbaum. These women were thought of as operators although their tasks were arduous, technical, and creative. These tasks include plugging in cables, setting switches, and partnering with scientists to write programs executed by punch cards.

The term “operator” downplays their role and hides the need to see beyond abstractions. They were enrolled in or recently graduated from Universities with relevant coursework degrees and chosen for their competence. The devaluation of women is reflected in society and can be observed surfacing on an individual level. In an interview with Jean Bartik she quotes Betty Holberton to say: “Look like a girl, act like a lady, think like a man, and work like a dog.” Even though this piece of advice for women at the time is said with humor and self awareness, it is still telling.

Certainly there are many brilliant men that are worth admiring, but what of the many female academic role models. It is important to recognize the accomplishments of women in order to inspire more young minds to visualize themselves contributing to the next technological advancement.


  • “ENIAC at Penn Engineering.” Penn Engineering, 2017, https://www.seas.upenn.edu/about/history-heritage/eniac/.
  • Guru, iPhone. “IPhone X as the Sum of Technologies: IGotOffer.” IGotOffer Blog, 5 Nov. 2017, https://igotoffer.com/blog/iphone-x-sum-technologies#:~:text=This%20is%20reportedly%20the%20AI,second%20for%20real%2Dtime%20processing.
  • Hines, Nickolaus. “The World’s First Computer Was Bigger than a T-Rex and 5 Million Times Weaker than an IPhone.” All That’s Interesting, All That’s Interesting, 9 Mar. 2016, https://allthatsinteresting.com/first-computer.
  • Jones, Brad, and Luke Larsen. “Long before Gates or Jobs, 6 Women Programmed the First Digital Computer.” Digital Trends, Digital Trends, 1 Mar. 2019, https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/remembering-eniac-and-the-women-who-programmed-it/.

Don’t Bother Remembering Passwords

Security and Convenience

I watched my father try to log into his Apple account and the experience was “painful”. He was denied time after time just when thinking he had recalled the right combination of characters. In fear of being locked out of his account because of too many tries, he went for the “Forgot my password” route.

Sometimes this path is implemented with the user in mind and involves a simple link to reset the password via email. Other times, it is a lengthier process involving multiple security questions. Questions that you thought the answer could only be one thing, but against all odds it is not currently working. There must be an easier way.

Characteristics of Strength

Experts recommend that a password be more than ten characters in length. Contain a variety of characters: uppercase, lowercase, numbers, and symbols. The passwords should not contain patterns, recognizable words, or anything else that is easy to guess[1]. Yes, I am talking to you if your password is “password123”. It is also advisable that passwords are not re-used from site to site. Be ready to remember seventy plus strings of near random characters. This is of course an unreasonable expectation, but there is a solution.


Password Managers to the Rescue

If you already use a password manager, please take this time to give yourself a pat on the back. Password managers have existed for over ten years. However, there are still many people who are not taking advantage of them. Many are free and open source like Bitwarden or KeePass. The idea is that you only need to remember one password and the manager keeps track of the rest. Typically they can also generate very strong passwords too. Passwords are always encrypted or hashed so the plain text versions of the passwords are not stored.

Encryption is a two way process involving a private key that the user can decrypt the cipher-text version of their password. On the other hand, hashing is deterministic meaning the algorithm produces the same result for the same input at a fixed length [2]. It is considered to be irreversible. Generally, hashing is done many times; Sometimes over 10,000 passes or 100,000 depending on the manager. I hope your interest is piqued about considering a password manager, if you were on the fence. Technology should simplify our lives, not add more stress.

Learn Efficiently, Depart from Tutorials

Calling all Tutorial Fanatics

When diving into a new skill or unfamiliar task, a natural response is to try to find a reference video. Youtube is a popular site, but there are many others. Perhaps you have felt the thrill of finding the “perfect” video to explain everything you need to know about topic X. It does not matter whether X is a certain library function in a programming language, a completely new framework, or even a step-by-step guide on swing dancing. Surely, by the end of this 20 minute (or 6 hour) video, you can achieve mastery of the topic.

Disappointing Denouement

It is possible that after watching a single online video that the task can be completed with confidence; More often than not, this is not the case. For anyone following along with a multiple hour long lesson, it can be disappointing to realize that there is a gap in the knowledge when it is time to apply the information on your own project. Most tutorials seem to boil down to the common theme of “just do it”.

Leave Tutorials Behind

Before pouring hours of time into watching tutorials or previewing documentation, there is an optimal amount of time to spend on preparation. Everyone learns skills differently at their own pace. However, most people can agree that it is not worth spending unnecessary time on something without a large benefit. There is some satisfaction in having “completed” a tutorial. Not everyone has the luxury of time to devote to that.

Skill of Set up and Go

This is where the skill of gathering just as much information from a tutorial to get started comes in to play. Leave the door open for experimentation and testing boundaries. Any further questions that may come up can be answered along the way without wasting time on things that are intuitive. When time is precious, hands on experience will prove more valuable than the facade of experience from a code along video in the long run. Use your time wisely!

Web Dev Beginners: React or Angular?

Have you recently learned HTML, CSS, and Javascript basics and want to level up your UI? I found myself in this position recently and the most popular options were React and Angular. Successful corporations seemed to use both of them. Facebook, Netflix, and DropBox use React meanwhile, IBM, PayPal, and Delta use Angular. “What is the difference, how do I choose between them?”, I wondered. So I tried making sites on both of them concurrently and I hope my reflection provides you with a little insight.

Wait, what are we talking about?

React is a Javascript library while Angular is an interface mostly using Typescript for building responsive UI. Typescript is a superset of Javascript that is compiled instead of interpreted (you can find out more about those differences here). Both Angular (maintained by Google) and React (maintained by Facebook) are open source and revolve around the idea of having reusable smaller components.


By components, I am referring to anything that you may have more than one of (think modals, search bars, cards, etc.). This also allows compartmentalization of features to avoid having one daunting block of HTML. For those who aren’t interested in spending hours fine tuning CSS styling, they both offer components ready to use out of the box (I am counting React Bootstrap here) for all your basic needs. So, what is the big deal then… Why choose one over the other?




Both are pretty hefty and can take a few minutes to get installed. The process can be completed with a simple terminal command (technically, two commands for Angular).

Getting Started: REACT

If the project was made with create-react-app, everything is set up to get started with a single page application. The App component is the root and new components resemble the same structure as the App. It is best to keep those in separate JS files and import them as necessary. Each component basically looks like a function that returns an HTML element (this can be one element with several other encapsulated within like a div). JSX , a “syntax extension” is helpful here and bridges functionality of Javascript with HTML elements.

Getting Started: Angular

There is undeniably a learning curve here. Angular components are more modular. Each component typically has a Typescript file that holds all the behaviors, an HTML file, CSS file, and a testing file. Of course, there is a single command (generate) that will provide all of these as a skeleton ready to set up. The HTML file is more advanced and can be used with text interpolation, and binding. The syntax of how to achieve these isn’t immediately obvious. I found myself doing a lot of Googling at first to figure out the creation of a simple form, for example.

Basic Development: React

There is a lot that React can accomplish, but as a complete beginner, it is easy to get started quickly with only understanding a few concepts. The state of components (achieved through useState) is straight forward to manage (think, if a user enters something from an input it can be displayed in real time somewhere else). The rendering of components can be handled by one call to useEffect. Data can be passed around from different components by assigning different arguments (props) when “calling” your component from its parent. If this sounds, tricky, trust me it is not. One ten-twenty minute YouTube video can explain all this and more.

Basic Development: Angular

There are more moving pieces to Angular. Achieving an API call from a component isn’t as simple as calling upon fetch like one might do in a React script. Connecting to a database and routing took more time to figure out. Various Typescript files were necessary to create a model for the structure of data that was expected, a service to communicate between components, and a resolver. Angular has impressive lifecycle hooks for what to do upon initiation, multiple state checks, and destruction. The form validation is also very customizable and has useful presets to track pristine, dirty, etc. ( touched or untouched). Both Angular and React have development servers to locally build your project with one command. Changes are viewable upon each save.

The Decision

Try them both if you have the interest! I know that is not incredibly helpful, but what better way to find out. I can say that if you are short on time, the rumors are true, go with React. However, if you like to be able to control the minutia of how your components respond to user interaction with a streamlined system, it may be worth your time to learn Angular. At the end of the day, there may be someone accessing your website from their terminal and your fancy interface will not matter either way. 🙂

This is the same webpage you are currently looking at without JS…