A Hybrid Vision for SPAN 113

Welcome to SPAN 113, hybrid style!  SPAN 113 is the third course in the first year Spanish series.  The course typically draws CLA students part way through filling a 2-year language requirement or other students with a language requirement.  There are also generally a handful of students pursuing a Spanish minor and a few students interested in learning for personal or professional reasons and taking it as an elective. Enrollment is typically between 25 and 30 students.  The course focuses on improving Spanish skills in speaking, listening, writing and reading, as well as topics related to the cultures of the Spanish speaking world (including Spanish speakers in the U.S.).  In it’s hybrid format, the course will meet twice a week for 50 minutes (instead of four times a week in the non-hybrid format).

Because OSU already offers SPAN 113 both fully online and fully face-to-face, we have a good sense of what types of assignments work well in each format and which result in challenges particular to a given format.  For example, our online students have fewer opportunities to engage in speaking practice.  They also hear less modeling of spoken Spanish from their instructor.  Finally, they face ongoing challenges when completing group and partner assignments due to time zone differences and other communication barriers in the online environment.   For this reason, the majority of the time spent in class will be dedicated to speaking practice, group work, and other listening and speaking assignments with the instructor and classmates.

On the other hand, the online format has proved to be an excellent setting for assuring participation from all students.  Discussion boards online are a great space for discussing cultural topics, asking questions that can benefit the entire class, presenting projects and providing peer reviews.  Students that would typically not participate in an in-class discussion are incited to do so on a graded discussion board.  Also, online video lectures with built in quizzes will prepare students for in-class activities where they can apply the concepts presented in the E-lessons.  In class time at the beginning of each face-to-face session will be dedicated to checking comprehension of the materials presented in these lessons, going over common errors from the video quizzes and allowing students to ask questions.

The creation of this course in its hybrid format is a collaborative project between three colleagues.  I did not read their blog posts on the same topic as I was curious to see how our visions would match!

Posted in Hybrid Course Design, Integrating Online & On-Campus Learning | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hybridizing “society and natural resources”

what is the course about?

I have taught SOC 481/581 for 4 years now. I have modified it slightly every time I teach it; and finally feel that it is ready for a hybrid version. It is ideally suited to this, actually, because there are SO MANY possible topics to cover related to the environmental crises of our time. Ultimately I want to give students the opportunity to form their own criteria, based on “theory” and some guidelines for critical thinking. Broadly, the course explores the complexities of relationships between people and their environment; highlighting how most (if not all) processes (e.g. decisions, politics, movements, etc.) related to the environment are tightly coupled to human conditions and processes. Overall, I hope to introduce students to the “human dimensions of the environment”, using theoretical approaches, social science methods, and applied examples and skills for natural resource management.


Proposed structure of the course:

I will provide the reading materials (mainly from a book, with some additional related readings) and ask students to meet in pairs prior to our weekly meeting to discuss the reading materials. They will have to complete an outline of these materials. This outline will then be the first thing we discuss in class during our face-to-face meeting. Assuming content is understood, we will then move into an activity or in-class case study to link the reading with a “real world” scenario. After linking the material with the activity (and using some guided points on how to critically reflect on these issues), students will be asked to either complete a writing assignment or an online discussion. Both of these (due at the end of the week), will have a prompt developed by the instructor, related to the readings and possibly even the class activity.


Final assignment!

Finally, instead of a course final, I do a 2-week case study that wraps up all the content from the prior 8 weeks, and asks students to complete a set of assignments (concept mapping following a classic applied policy analysis tool – DPSIR, stakeholder analysis, policy brief writing, and prompted questions) in a group.


It is an experiment to do it in hybrid format! and I sure do hope it works!!

Posted in Hybrid Course Content, Hybrid Course Delivery, Hybrid Course Design, Integrating Online & On-Campus Learning | 1 Comment

Spanish 113 in a nutshell

In Spanish 113, as with all of our first and second-year courses, we focus on speaking, listening, writing, and reading skills. We introduce our students to the richness of Hispanic cultures, and we focus on the 5 C’s of language learning: communication, connections, comparisons, cultures, and communities.  On average, our classes have about 25 students in them, and the communicative abilities of the students in any given section always vary, which makes it a challenge for us. Our classes are student-centered, and so they’re very interactive and based on communicative tasks (that is, using the language to communicate authentic meaning within a given context). All of our first and second-year courses are 4 credit hours, and each week, students will spend two hours online (in addition to the normal studying and homework that they would complete outside of class), and they will have two one-hour sessions of face-to-face time.

So, what will our hybrid courses look like? The obvious answer is that we’ll use the face-to-face time to do things that students can’t do online. That likely means that most of our spontaneous speaking activities will take place in the face-to-face setting, and we’ll also likely use the weekly meetings to do things like presentations and proctored evaluations. Beyond that, we are still very much trying to figure this out. As I have said in our weekly meetings, we have a lot of good online content from our e-campus courses, and a lot of those assignments will end up forming the backbone of our hybrid courses. The advantage of the hybrid delivery model is that, rather than being limited in their spontaneous interactions, students will have the opportunity to come to class twice a week and practice face-to-face communication, which we have struggled to implement in our e-campus courses. So, we feel like it has the potential to be the best of both worlds.

We’re excited about the potential of these classes, but we still have a lot of work to do with respect to content creation and coming up with our weekly schedules. I’m thankful to be working with Emily and Raven, because this takes a lot of time and thought, and I can’t imagine trying to do it without them.

Posted in Hybrid Course Content, Hybrid Course Delivery, Hybrid Course Design, Integrating Online & On-Campus Learning | 1 Comment

Sages and curators

I’ve thought for a long time about the ways in which education has been becoming more student centered and less “sage on a stage”.   The latter description of teaching feels dismissive to me of how much earlier generations learned from people who synthesized, organized, weighted and presented bodies of information and ideas that now are widely available through multiple media.  Rather than dismiss the sages, I’d argue that good sages have always been curators  and that the job of synthesizing, organizing, weighing and presenting is even more critical today given the boundless un-curated streams of media and information available 24/7 on the internet and elsewhere.

Training students to be curators, encouraging students to engage with the work of weighing, assessing, critiquing what they hear and observe and take for granted are some of the goals of the academic discipline of Sociology, the field in which I’ve been creating online and hybrid courses this past year.   Some of the ways to cultivate curating that I’m integrating into those courses include:  Student driven research — in which students collaborate with others around a short autoethnography assignment from which they  generate a set of research questions they  “take into the field” doing interviews and writing a research report that synthesizes theory and observation, that is then shared as a group in a presentation online.   Another way that students can be encouraged to become curators is by giving them data to describe, interpret and explain vis a vis other data they’ve encountered in readings or research.  Practicing interpreting what they read in discussion with others, sifting the weight of evidence among conflicting ideas, and getting students out into the community — collecting observational notes, writing about what they see, and comparing those observations with other students —  gets them away from the stage, and cultivates curating in a community with other learners.

Posted in Hybrid Course Content, Hybrid Course Delivery | Leave a comment

How to Create Peer to Peer Engagement Online in a Hybrid Course

One of the common pitfalls in online course design is not creating opportunities and engagement for students to discuss, critique and learn from one another in the online environment.

I will avoid this in my hybrid class by:

  1. Emphasizing the importance of peer to peer learning in the course syllabus and explaining to the students that this is will be an important component to the course experience and one of our core learning methods.
  2. Designing graded assignments that require students to collaborate, discuss and present as a shared experience online — in process and presentation.
  3. Utilizing online tools that allow students to explore, practice and understand how different platforms, deliveries and methods of creating a ‘shared work experience’ will enhance their learning and inform their practice.
Posted in Hybrid Course Content, Hybrid Course Delivery | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Course Design Pitfall #4: Expect Your Students to Consume Knowledge Rather Than Create It

This pitfall stood out to me, as it seemed it would be an easy trap to fall into while redesigning the course I teach. Many of the resources previously developed for the Special Animal Med course are geared toward a course format where the instructor feeds the class information, the students consume the knowledge, and then the students confirm that the knowledge was assimilated by reproducing it for a test. While hopefully this transfer of knowledge has been delivered in an interesting and thoughtful way, it has been passive rather than actively engaging the students.

I hope to avoid this pitfall by purposefully redesigning the course materials to actively engage the students. Much of what they will do “in the real world” when they encounter these unusual species in the clinic will be gathering and applying their own resources to clinical case. My goal is to incorporate exercises where the students “create knowledge” by gathering information and synthesizing it into a format for sharing with their peers or potentially the pet-owning public. For example, the Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine hosts an event called “Pet Day” which is open to the public. I would love to see the class create several interactive stations or exhibits that could educate and inspire Pet Day attendees on topics like comparing sources of dietary vitamin C for guinea pigs or how to create an ideal habitat for your rat.

Posted in Hybrid Course Content, Hybrid Course Design | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Becoming “The Guide on the Side”: Centering Students in Hybrid Courses

As long as I’ve been a Spanish teacher (sixteen years now!) we as a profession have been talking about and moving toward student-centered, content-based, and task- or project-based teaching; language instructors have long since stopped seeing themselves as the proverbial “Sage on the Stage” (see Online Course Design Pitfall #3: Insist on being the “sage on the stage.” from this article).  And while being a facilitator rather than an all-knowing keeper of information looks a bit different in an online or hybrid environment than in a fully F2F class, I imagine we can apply the many of the same skills to make sure our students remain the central focus of our courses.

In order to keep our hybrid courses student-centered both inside and outside of the classroom, we must avoid the temptation to overuse recorded grammar lectures and stuff the online component of the course with prepackaged content delivery while reserving our task-based, communicative activities for our classroom meetings.

One specific activity that may help us avoid this issue is a great tool available for Canvas: the glossary function.

In face-to-face Spanish courses, students are given a list of vocabulary words to memorize at the beginning of each lesson.  They’re expected to use these words, but the list is never sufficient, and students make frequent use of tools like google translate and wordreference.com while they’re completing assignments in Spanish courses.  Why not make this necessary part of language learning into a wiki-building activity? Whenever students need to look up a word for an assignment, they can add it to the course glossary– complete with definitions, tags, relevant images or examples– thereby creating a living, evolving, searchable document to which students both contribute and refer.  The course glossary is accessible via a plugin that’s displayed on every Canvas window in the course, so it’s easy to navigate, consult, and build.

There are many ways to make sure students are the principal content-creators in both the online and F2F portions of hybrid courses; this is just one I’m excited to try!

Posted in Hybrid Course Content, Hybrid Course Design | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Creative Ownership Through Applied Studio Exercises

My focus is on Course Design Pitfall #4 Expect you students to consume knowledge rather than create it. The course I am developing for hybrid learning is a digital arts studio course focused on narrative storytelling. In this course students learn about screenwriting, storyboarding, shot composition, editing for story and animation from several lectures and tutorials. They then apply all aspects of preparation for production to their very own large scale creative project based on their very own story. In this way they not only become familiar with the concepts and terminology associated with the storytelling creative industry, they also get and opportunity to create their own and have a significant portfolio piece for graduation.

Preproduction has a fairly steep learning curve in terms of the digital art tools and I provide several pre-recorded software tutorials for students. This gives the students a fairly large tool kit to choose from when they produce their animatics for the end of term. In order for students to create their own knowledge rather than consume it I will have them talk to each other regularly in class during our face-to-face time through a series of project check-ins. This activity is where students get into small groups and chat about their own approaches to to making their project. This is also an opportunity for students to talk about creative problems they are having and helping each other solve technical issues. Through these group activities/check-ins my hope is that students will create their own knowledge with each other as they choose the best techniques for their large scale creative project. Students will forge their own creative path and technical approach to digital storytelling in a linear narrative format.

Posted in Hybrid Course Design | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Use of online homework to link courses in the curriculum

This post is generally related to pitfall number 5:Ignore the ways students learn from each other.

I consider it very important to have a handle on how my students link the material in my course with information in other courses, both those that they are taking currently and those they took in previous terms. To assess this, I ask the students to identify a subject that we will discuss in my course – usually within the next week or so – and find material from a previous course that will supplement my lecture. For example, we might talk about a particular bacterial species in my class… well, they had heard of that bacteria in Immunology class from last term. Students work in pairs and provide a visual from the previous class and discuss how it is connected with the subject that we will talk about. One-page assignments are delivered to me by email and I evaluate them every other day or so. I will comment if they have inaccuracies in their report and ask them to fix it. Students are responsible for four submissions per term and they can choose which week they wish to complete their homework.

I have used this for several years now and here following are the specific benefits I see:

  • I get a sense of what students know before they hear my lecture
  • I can position myself to stress concepts that were not evident in their homework
  • I can go talk to previous instructors about things I think they present incorrectly in their class (has happened!). Vice versa has happened as well- I have changed my lectures to reflect more accurately a concept from a previous class.
  • Students process information from the previous class in the context of what they will hear from me
  • Students review their previous class material as they try to find subjects to write about in their homework
  • Students work in pairs and can use the time to communicate about subject matter
  • Finally – if a student has a great question in class or a specific topic that they are interested in, I will ask them to explore that question in a homework format and submit it as one of their assignments.

I have found this approach very successful as I work to integrate course material vertically and horizontally in our curriculum. I expect to continue and perhaps expand this as I transition to the hybrid course strategy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Using student-student interaction to increase learning

My post is addressing pitfall #5 in the article that we read (ignoring the ways in which students learn from each other).

One of the things that we do in our online Spanish classes that we will carry over into our hybrid courses is incentivizing specific types of student-student interaction. We often do this by requiring peer reviews of important projects. This has a number of different benefits. First, it keeps students engaged in the course, and it forces them to not only view the content that their peers have created but also to comment on it in a meaningful way. I encourage students to avoid generic remarks such as “good job” or “great work” and to instead focus on specific things that the person did well and / or particular areas in which they could improve. As a result, students have to look more deeply at the work of their peers, and the feedback that students receive on their work is often more useful. In addition, when students engage more meaningfully with their peers, they inevitably learn more.

Under this model, grades are determined not only by the work that students produce but also by the authenticity and specificity of their peer reviews. Students quickly learn that they can’t receive full credit for writing a mediocre peer review, and by the end of the course, they have turned into constructive critics.

As a side note, I’ll say that this also makes our jobs easier. While peer reviews cannot take the place of instructor feedback, instructors can reference certain peer reviews in the feedback they leave for students, which often makes us more efficient graders.

Posted in Hybrid Course Delivery, Hybrid Course Design | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment