Login
Links
-
Recent Posts
- ICST 2017: The Theory of Composite Faults 10/12/2016
- FSE 2016: Can Testedness be Effectively Measured? 29/05/2016
- Software Quality Journal 2016: Does The Choice of Mutation Tool Matter? 08/05/2016
- ICSTW 2016: Measuring Effectiveness of Mutant Sets 08/05/2016
- ICSE 2016: On the limits of mutation reduction strategies 15/12/2015
- ISSRE 2015: How hard does mutation analysis have to be, anyway? 20/08/2015
- ASE 2015: How Verified is My Code? Falsification-Driven Verification 20/07/2015
- ESEM 2015: An empirical study of design degradation: how software projects get worse over time 20/05/2015
- ISSRE 2014: Mutations How close are they to real faults? 06/08/2014
- Sunbelt 2014: Temporal Visualization of Dynamic Collaboration Graphs of OSS Software Forks 28/01/2014
- ICSE 2014: Code Coverage for Suite Evaluation by Developers 28/01/2014
- OSS 2014: An Exploration of Factors Affecting Code Quality in FOSS Projects 20/01/2014
- OSS 2014: Drawing the Big Picture: Temporal Visualization of Dynamic Collaboration Graphs of OSS Software Forks 10/01/2014
- CHI 2014: Abandonment of Social Networks: Shift from Use to Non-Use and Experiences of Technology Non-Use 01/01/2014
- Entries 31/12/2013
Tag Archives: 2016
FSE 2016: Can Testedness be Effectively Measured?
Among the major questions that a practicing tester faces are deciding where to focus additional testing effort, and deciding when to stop testing. Test the least-tested code, and stop when all code is well-tested, is a reasonable answer. Many measures … Continue reading
Posted in All, Publications
Tagged 2016, Alex Groce, Caius Brindescu, Carlos Jensen, fse, FSE2016, Iftekhar Ahmed, Rahul Gopinath
Leave a comment
Software Quality Journal 2016: Does The Choice of Mutation Tool Matter?
Mutation analysis is the primary means of evaluating the quality of test suites, though it suffers from inadequate standardization. Mutation analysis tools vary based on language, when mutants are generated (phase of compilation), and target audience. Mutation tools rarely implement … Continue reading
Posted in Publications
Tagged 2016, Alex Groce, Amin Alipour, Carlos Jensen, Iftekhar Ahmed, Rahul Gopinath, SQJ
Leave a comment
ICSTW 2016: Measuring Effectiveness of Mutant Sets
Redundant mutants, where multiple mutants end up producing same the semantic variant of the program is a major problem in mutation analysis, and a measure of effectiveness is an essential tool for evaluating mutation tools, new operators, and reduction techniques. … Continue reading
Posted in Publications
Tagged 2016, Alex Groce, Amin Alipour, Carlos Jensen, ICST, Iftekhar Ahmed, Rahul Gopinath
Leave a comment
ICSE 2016: On the limits of mutation reduction strategies
Although mutation analysis is considered the best way to evaluate the effectiveness of a test suite, hefty computational cost often limits its use. To address this problem, various mutation reduction strategies have been proposed, all seeking to gain efficiency by … Continue reading
Posted in Publications
Tagged 2016, Alex Groce, Amin Alipour, Carlos Jensen, icse, ICSE2016, Iftekhar Ahmed, Rahul Gopinath
Leave a comment