What Makes an Interview Effective vs Ineffective?

What’s the Point of an Interview?

The reason for an interview is to evaluate potential candidates for a position at your company. By conducting an interview, you’ll be able to assess if the person is what you are looking for. The type of interview you conduct should be based off of methods with systematic data so they are reliable, valid, and have good utility.

The Big Three

  1. Reliability – the consistency and dependability of a performance measure; the degree to which it is free from error; a necessary condition for validity
  2. Validity – the extent to which a performance measure assesses what it’s supposed to measure (i.e., relates to how accurately it measures something);
  3. Selection utility – the extent to which a selection procedure is worth the time and money

Personal Experience

I have had a few job interviews, however not a lot that were memorable. The job interviews I have been interviewed for were structured. Most of the questions were pretty standard, relating to behavioral and situational questions. An example for a cafe barista position that I was interviewing for asked me “Tell me about a time when a customer was upset with their order and what did you do about it?”. These kinds of questions are good because this will let the interviewer know how well I performed at a task. In this setting, you would call this kind of interview reliable, as it is structured and standard questions.

Another interview, I suppose you would call it that, was surprisingly done online through DMing each other on the platform Instagram. This was for a local small donut shop hiring for a barista and cashier. The utility of this method was high, as it was easy to text each party, however the questions on their side would be considered unreliable and not valid. As they didn’t really know who I was. The questions consisted of “Have you worked customer service before? Have you made espresso before?” etc. They hired me on the spot with no in person interview, and very little questions about my previous work history and experience. Needless to say I did not work there very long.

By comparing some of the interviews I have had in the past I would recommend these employers to try to schedule a meeting professionally, whether on zoom or in person. Having a variety of questions to understand the person as a whole, such as behavioral questions , open-ended questions and be sure to avoid obvious questions.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Overcoming Some of the Challenges Associated With Developing and Maintaining Job Descriptions.

What even are job descriptions?

The most basic function of Human Resources, job descriptions help describe the necessary functions of the job posting. They include information such as; job identification, job summary, task statements, the Knowledge Skill Ability Other characteristics (KSAO’s), physical demands, and working conditions. As simple as job descriptions may seem, there are surprisingly challenges that come with them to be cautious of.

Challenges

Some of the challenges associated with job descriptions include legal issues and being able to be reflecting the role itself. If a job description is poorly created, outdated, or unclear, an employee could potentially being able to have a case against you. Not only legal action is worrisome, but when employees don’t have a crystal clear idea of their job, it can lead to inefficient work and productivity.

““Having a bad job description is worse than [having] none at all,” asserts Tracy McCarthy, senior vice president of HR at SilkRoad, a talent management organization headquartered in Chicago.”

– Katherine Tyler, author of Job Worth Doing: Update Descriptions

Solutions

Some of the ways you can overcome bad job descriptions is to have a proper task be created. This would include an action verb, object of interest, and clarification of the conditions, equipment, and purpose. An example provided by Dr. Michele Swift is “Makes espresso drinks using espresso maker and other coffee equipment to serve customer drinks“. Another thing to keep in mind is to conduct an annual review of the job description. As time moves on, the job description could be completely different than what it was, especially with technological advances.

You can also use a variety of sources to get accurate job descriptions. Sources include the incumbent, the supervisor, and O*Net. By speaking with the incumbent, you can get a picture of what they do for their job. The supervisor is the best source of information regarding the importance of what the job entails. O*Net is the source of occupational data compiled by the U.S Department of Labor, and this resource is super helpful when you are starting or drafting the job description or when comparing them (Swift).

By reviewing the job description annually, having a proper task, and actively using the sources available, you can create an accurate job description, will help you steer clear of bad job descriptions

Citations

Swift, Michelle. “Week Four”, MGMT 453, 27 October 2024, Oregon State University, Class Lecture.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hello world!

Welcome to blogs.oregonstate.edu. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment