The most important thing I learned from this class was on the cognitive and non-cognitive predictors that are used through the interview and selection process. I thought it was interesting to learn about the different aspects that are considered during the hiring process and the tools that are used to assess potential candidates. I have always enjoyed taking cognitive ability assessments, especially ones focused on problem solving, memory, reasoning, etc. Although I’m not very good with some parts of these tests, I still like to see how I score and perform. I took my first personality test during highschool for a class and it motivated me to learn more about the MBTI (Meyers-Briggs type indicator) and enneagram tests. I didn’t realize how many different tests and assessments there really were until I took this class and it was interesting to see which ones are commonly used by organizations. One last factor that I found important was the role of education and experience in performance predictors. I was initially surprised that the test utility is low because I had always assumed that it was a large factor in hiring decisions.
There are so many different methods and factors to consider when it comes to the hiring and selection process, and these tools are great ways to get more insight on the performance of potential talent. I don’t necessarily think that employers should solely rely on these assessments because of the risk of bias and adverse impact, it is critical to ensure inclusivity while also considering the performance predictors. Learning more about these predictors has helped me get a better understanding of how the interview process is structured. This will help me feel more prepared going into interviews because I can improve the things I can and learn how to become a more qualified candidate.