In the extraversion dimension I scored and average score. This means that I am not a lonely person but at the same time I don’t go and spark up conversations with everybody I see. In the agreeablness demtion I also scored and average score. Thus meaning i am in the middle for caring for others. I put others first while also protecting myself at the same time. In the conscientiousness dimension I scored in the middle yet again. This meaning I am reliable, organized, and have self control. In the neuroticism dimension I scored on the low end. This means that I can handle stressful situations when most people wouldn’t. In the openness to experience dimension I also scored low. This meaning I like to keep it simple and not get to crazy.

If I was a potential employer looking at these results I would be very happy. This might be a little bias because they are my results be honestly speaking they are good. I would say every category I scored exactly where an exployer would want to hire fi they wanted to hire the safest canidate. Scoring in the middle on the extraversion category is good for a team role but maybe not a very vocal leader. I enjoy talking to people but I do not like bothering people just to talk to them. In the agreeablness category I would be a good hire because I put others first, while also protecting myself. I think this is perfect if an employer was looking at this. In the conscientiousness category I am well organized with self control. I did score lower on the self discipline but still was very high which I think an employer would want.  In the neuorticism I scored on the low end which is very good when looking at potential employees. Being able to handle stressful situations without overeating is very important, expitially in a team environment. The last category is openness to experience, I scored in the low end. This might be hard to judge depending on what type of employee they are looking for. Being on the low end would be a conservative choice for en employee.