If I had to choose between Avery and Jaime, I would hire Jaime. While Avery might have higher potential and occasionally deliver incredible work, the lack of motivation and initiative would make it very difficult to work with her. Even the most talented person is hard to rely on if they do not show up consistently or need to be pushed just to get the basics done. In a role that is essential to my business, I need someone dependable who takes ownership of their responsibilities and can be trusted to follow through. Jaime may not have the same peak performance as Avery, but they show up every day ready to work, take initiative, and deliver results. That kind of consistency and reliability is far more valuable to me in the long run.
That said, there are jobs where someone like Avery could be the right fit. Roles that revolve around creativity or breakthrough performance, such as a freelance designer, consultant, or innovator, could benefit from her potential. In these types of jobs, success might come from a few standout moments rather than everyday performance. If managed correctly and motivated by the right project, Avery’s talent could make a huge impact, even if she is not reliable day to day.
On the other hand, Jaime would be perfect for positions that require strong routines and steady output, like customer service, operations, or team coordination. These jobs need someone who not only shows up but also takes initiative and solves problems consistently. Jaime brings that level of dedication and dependability, which is essential for keeping a business running smoothly.
4 replies on “Typical vs. Maximal Performance ”
Hi Madilyn- I totally agree with your post. I also feel like I resemble Jamie in terms of consistent and strong work ethic. I feel there are many jobs that value consistent performance over “game time” performance per say.
Hi Madilyn! I think you make a really solid case for choosing Jaime. Especially when it comes to roles that require consistency, you need someone to be present. I totally agree that as a manager, you need someone who’s going to be responsible and have some accountability without being micromanaged, and it sounds like Jaime is that person. I also like how you pointed out that Avery might thrive in a different type of role. This is a good reminder that the “right” hire really just depends on the job itself, not just qualifications on paper.
Hello Madilyn,
I agreed with choosing Jamie if I was a business owner as well. I do like how you mentioned how if Avery is hired for a role, being managed and motivated in the right way can contribute to Avery’s successes which is important to note because it is not always efficient to have a maximal performer.
Hi Madilyn- I think it really comes down to what type of position you are hiring for, or what type of company you have. If customer service is top priority, then Jamie would be the perfect candidate offering consistent customer service every day. If the position was one that had deadlines that needed to be met, or an outstanding record to uphold, Avery would probably be a better option for that short-term maximum performance level that she has to offer. You gave some great examples of what each candidate might have to offer certain positions within the company. Great job!