There are a few reasons to take the gray wolf off the endangered species list. According to a study by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the gray wolf is not “in danger of [extinction] in any significant portion of its range [in Oregon]” ( Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife). Basically, the gray wolf has grown to such a large population and range that (in Oregon at least), barring some unexpected development that would cause a rapid decline in population, the population of the gray wolf should be stable for the foreseeable future (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife). However, it should be noted that this study was only conducted for the state of Oregon (and not for other states like Idaho and Montana) so while it may be practical to take wolves off the endangered species list in Oregon, it may not be practical to do the same in Idaho or Montana, where there are different cultural and political factors at play. Another reason to take wolves off the endangered species list is that an increase in wolf populations due to wolves having no natural predators (besides humans) could affect ranchers in the area who depend on cattle for income. The average cattle costs around “$2000 to $5000 to raise” ( Animal Care Practice) which means that if one were to be taken by a wolf that’s a revenue loss of around that price. Since there are more wolves around (and therefore more cattle being killed by the wolves) it stands to reason that ranchers should have a way to protect their cattle, which the ESA may hamper. However, the impact that the gray wolf has on cattle ranchers may be somewhat overblown, given that for every 44,853 cattle that live in the west, wolves only kill one ((Living with wolves) . One final reason to delist wolves is that the cost of management for wolves once wolves are decreases by a significant amount (Sims et. al. 2020). An example of this can be seen in Yellowstone where, once wolves were delisted, the management cost for maintaining populations dropped by around 1.88 million dollars (Sims et. al. 2020).
There are also a few reasons to not take wolves off the endangered species list. If wolves are taken off the endangered species list, states like Idaho and Montana could effectively eliminate the wolves within their states and get rid of all protections that the wolves may have had. Essentially, if wolves are taken off the endangered species list, they could once again become extirpated through much of their natural range, which would mean that the recovery efforts for the gray wolf would have been in vain and may need to take place again, therefore wasting time and resources. Furthermore, if wolves are extirpated in these areas, this could have a negative effect on the surrounding ecosystem, since wolves are a keystone species (Hayward 2009). Without wolves, large herbivores such as elk or deer roam around the ecosystem with almost no natural predators (besides humans) which tears up and destroys much of the riparian habitat within the ecosystem, which can affect other species (Hayward 2009). Perhaps the most famous example of this is in Idaho, where, once the gray wolf was reintroduced, the riparian habitat surrounding the rivers and streams of the state grew, which provided shelter and much needed shade cover for fry and parr of threatened salmonidae species, such as Chinook, Steelhead, Sockeye, and Coho salmon (Hayward 2009). A final reason why wolves should not be taken off the endangered species list is that they are culturally significant to many tribes in North America (Nez Perce National Historical Trail). If wolves were to be taken off the endangered species list, their protections would then be taken away and therefore face a chance of extirpation from the regions where they were introduced. If they were to become extirpated again, there would be a significant cultural loss for these tribes. By ignoring the cultural significance of wolves to the native people of the land, we would be, in a way, disrespecting their tribal sovereignty, which has, among other things, a number of legal implications, since tribes are considered “dependent sovereign nations” who the U.S. federal government has a legal obligation to protect and recognize their sovereignty (Frequently Asked Questions Bureau of Indian Affairs).
In conclusion, although there are valid reasons to take the gray wolf off the endangered species list, it seems that the benefits of keeping the gray wolf on the endangered species list outweigh the consequences.
