Tobin Burke
Reflecting on past training experiences, one that stands out as particularly beneficial was a GPS training I participated in. This session offered both visual demonstrations and hands-on practice, showing us how to operate GPS equipment, collect topographic data, and generate field models. The interactive nature of the training made the content more engaging and helped cement my understanding of the technology. By applying the concepts in real-time, I developed practical skills I could use on the job right away. This training aligned with best practices discussed in this week’s material, especially the importance of using multiple training methods, including visual and experiential learning, to improve retention and transfer of knowledge.
In contrast, an all-day safety training I attended felt like the opposite. It relied almost entirely on lecture-based instructions, with minimal interaction or visual support. The room was dimly lit, the slides were text-heavy, and the speaker droned on for hours. I noticed several people losing focus, some even falling asleep. This experience lacked the engagement strategies needed to hold attention and encourage participation. Without active involvement, it’s unlikely participants retain or apply what they learn.
The difference between these two sessions highlights how delivery methods can make or break a training experience. Training that incorporates real-world application, visual aids, and interactive elements is far more effective than passive lectures alone. To be successful, training should be designed with the learner’s experience and attention span in mind.