Crowdsourcing for Information

Recently, the Accelerator expanded our program offering from one, 5-month immersive program into three separate components, Iterate, Accelerate, and Launch. Our new, modular programming design allows our clients to better understand their market opportunities and take advantage of the module that offers the next best step for their venture.

Our pre-accelerator program, started last May and refined in November, is called “Iterate.” This successful four-week program is focused on problem/solution fit. In fact, this program is in such high demand that our last program was oversubscribed. We can currently accommodate only 25 teams.

Our second program is a shortened version of our former 5-month program. This new program is called “Accelerate.” Accelerate is a two-month program focused on product/market fit. We use the Business Model Canvas and customer development methodology for this program. Getting the product/market fit right was often the most difficult task for our clients, and thus, a good place to pause and reflect.

Our newest offering is “Launch!” The focus of this program is to create an operational company and develop a repeatable selling mode. In Launch, we focus on the critical left-hand side of the Business Model Canvas. An outline of the program is located on our website under Launch. Links to Iterate and Accelerate are also located there as well.

In developing Launch we turned to our trusted advisors, mentors, alumni and friends to provide input and feedback to assist us in creating this new program. We have many detailed aspects of the program already in mind, but we have asked our advisors to add, delete, and help us find the missing ingredient to better assist our next cohort. This is truly a collaborative effort.

Our goal is to design a groundbreaking program based on the collective wisdom of all of us. In the first round, we requested respondents to use as much detail or as few words as you wish. We indicated that we would be happy to meet or talk with you and learn more about your thoughts. We were not particular about the form of the advice. Email responses work, too. We were focused principally on content.

The first round process is simple. We start with a very broad base of questions. We also provided the opportunity to opt out.

We anticipate a second round of questions that enables us to collate and narrow the groupthink. At some point after this, we will adopt a ranking system. We will ask that respondents categorize items by importance, or make suggestions to drop aspects that while thoughtful, may not be a fit for our goals.

We seek the broad picture. The Launch part of the program is focused on becoming operational. At this point, only companies that have a valid product/market fit, an MVP and some component of a team will be admitted to “Launch!” The program will be conducted over 5 months.

Some of the monthly topics we are tossing around include strategic partnerships; managing growth, burn rates, and proformas. We are also considering administrative functions such as legal and transactional issues, human resources, and accounting and record keeping. We are also deliberating on operations and value chains as suggested topics.

Here are some of the questions that we would like for you to ponder:

  • What general topics should govern those five months? Any ideas on the specific subtopics?
  • What three things do you wish you learned prior to starting your own venture or helping others get started?
  • What three things do you wish you knew while or before scaling this enterprise?
  • What were the biggest unforeseen obstacles or challenges that needed to be overcome?

As I write this, a few responses have arrived. As expected, building teams was a leading response. A few early indications included soft skills such as negotiation and hiring techniques, culture building and selling skills.

There will be more to come as we continue through this process.

Restart – Both the Blog and our Program

I’m back from a break in blogging with renewed optimism and an excellent new staff at the Advantage Accelerator. In reviewing our program over the past two years, I note we’ve had a number of successful ventures, but still find issues relying solely on Lean Launch Pad methodology.

The greatest issue is the time it takes entrepreneurs to acquire a product market fit. Product market fit is vital because it shows customer validation and the discovery of a repeatable sales process. In order to develop a successful fit, the entrepreneur must focus on finding a reasonably sized market for growth.

Our current Accelerator program runs five months and operates as an expanded version of the Lean Launch Pad. Many entrepreneurs successfully complete the Accelerator program in record pace; others struggle with product market fit that may cause a client to struggle. Finding the best response to the iteration or pivot while learning new skills can cause the most seasoned veterans of startup cultures to stumble.

The Lean Launch Pad model requires that product market fit must be validated. If product market fit is false, then the operational side of the startup is invalid. Moving forward into the execution side of the canvas would be wasteful based upon an invalid product market fit.

After considerable thought, we will now be dividing our current five-month accelerator program into two parts: “Accelerate” and “Launch!” These programs will be offered in addition to our existing pre-Accelerator program, “Iterate!”

Iterate is a pre-accelerator program that is focused on problem/solution fit. The program has four, 2-hour workshop sessions with outcomes based upon entrepreneurial thinking, value proposition, an introduction to the Business Model Canvas as a tool, a basic understanding of the customer discovery process, and an introduction to hypothesis testing and validation. These are all necessary tools designed to help understand the hard work in the process of becoming an entrepreneur.

The program homework is optional (hint: but it is a great screening tool for us) and all team members are strongly encouraged to attend all workshops. In order to move into the next phase, Accelerate, and gain acceptance into the Accelerator, there is an expectation of progress, hustle, and “grit.” These qualities are not the only qualifications for acceptance into the Accelerator, but they are helpful considerations in our decision-making.

Accelerate is focused on product/market fit. The objectives of the program are to confirm the entrepreneurial opportunity, define and build a minimal viable product, validate product market fit, complete a first sales call and develop a repeatable sales model, complete building the team, and to be ready to execute and build operations. The program is eight weeks and is backed with significant resources including our intern program, mentors, and first looks by our Executives in Residence and early investors.

Entrepreneurs may repeat the Accelerate program twice if an iteration or pivot is required. A major focus of this program is to reduce the uncertainty of the startup through validation of product/market fit. Successful clients may move forward to the Launch! Program.

Launch is a five-month program focused on taking the company to the build and sell level. There are two major goals: Fulfillment of build and execution on an operation growth plan, and realization of a repeatable sale process. Each month’s program is focused on a specific topic toward a deep dive into a milestone based growth plan. There is work for each week of the program that starts with the introduction of a topic, private coaching sessions, a cohort workshop and roundtable with the last session of each month being a formal Advisory Board session that consists of our senior programming staff, Executives in Residence and any mentor or advisor to the company.

Overall, we feel that separating the completion of product market fit until the concept is validated makes more sense than attempting to move on to build a company with less certainty of success.

Pitching Dominates

Pitching Dominates In Baseball & Entrepreneurship

Successfully Pitching to Angels

Last year in baseball was called the year of the pitcher—and good pitching dominated the game. The same is true in entrepreneurship. A startup is always pitching—to investors, strategic partners, channel partners, in an elevator, to potential employees, etc. I previously wrote about pitching form and what makes your pitch stick.

Today we discuss content in the pitch and what will impress an investor. First of all, remember that the goal of any pitch is to get to a second meeting. Just say enough to get investors interested in your business. Enough to want more information.

If you are pitching before angel investors then remember three major points. The first is that you must have proof of concept. This is usually a technical point: The technology works, beyond paper theory, and you have developed a minimal viable product, in the form of a prototype. An even better situation is to have customers lined up willing to test and purchase the product, called traction by investors. The second point is to show proof of market: Does your solution show evidence of a large market? The third major point is you must show evidence that positive cash flow is easily possible within a reasonably certain time span.

Be articulate, short and to the point. Use the KIS (Keep it Simple) method, as you never know for certain who in the audience, and who understands the technical points of your solution. Keep the technology talk to minimum. With regard to technology, a good pitcher only needs to show that their technology works and has protectable intellectual property.

There are a number of other points that will score points in the eyes of investors. Does your current team, not those that will join after you are funded, have the horsepower to execute and scale the company? Investors usually bet on the jockey (team) and not the horse (technology).

Here are a couple of recommended slide decks and don’t forget to put in a title and ending slide along with your contact information.

  1. Problem/solution
  2. Market potential
  3. Team
  4. Channels and got to market strategy
  5. Competition
  6. Financial projections
  7. The ask and use of funds
  8. Always have backup slides (these are slides that answers the first few most likely asked questions)

And here is alternative, similar version:

  1. You address an important problem
  2. Your proof that this solution is complete and a magnitude better than others
  3. There is a large market for the solution
  4. The solution is better than others and why
  5. You have demonstrated good progress
  6. The team can execute on the company
  7. The investment provides a reasonable return to investors

What else might impress a potential investor?

  • You know the rules of the game. For example, you understand how the investor operates, the investor’s average investment, you have completed your due diligence on the investor or group, your average valuations to prior investments, and what excites them about an entrepreneur. In other words, you understand their process.
  • A flexible management team, good potential returns and an idea when an exit might occur
  • Good use of the proceeds from the investment
  • Good and frequent communications
  • Delighting early customers
  • You listen and learn well
  • Good qualitative and quantitative milestones
  • You measure progress religiously

What are some of the pitch or deal killers?

  • Lack of clarity and not being articulate
  • Demonstrating lack of leadership qualities
  • Lack of appreciation for the competition
  • A pitch long on history and technology but lacking an execution plan
  • Generic assumptions
  • Underestimating the barriers to entry, or overestimating those for your competitors
  • Weak marketing and/or sales plan
  • Unrealistic financials
  • Unrealistic view of capital requirements

Pitchers rarely hit it out of the park. But that is your challenge, and your goal.

Monetize and Create an Annuity

Our clients at the OSU Advantage Accelerator are product oriented. In addition to products created on the internet, some of our clients work in the physical and life sciences. Among other things, they create spectrometers, legged moving robotics, and advanced arc detection systems. Some of our startups include econometrics companies, agricultural companies and software organizations as well. As far as innovation is concerned, we are technology without borders.

The question for all these companies is not just to make a simple sale from the products they create, but to develop annuity streams of future payments arising from these sales. How do we define annuity revenue? It is a predictable stream of income and profits derived from a wide variety of sources.

For example, one of my former clients sold a sophisticated piece of equipment used in forensics labs. While you might think forensics is a limited market, remember that not only local police departments have labs, so do the sheriffs and regional police, State police, Federal labs like the CIA, FBI, Homeland Security and many other law enforcement agencies in the United States, as well as within the international community.

Here is how they created annuity from the sales:

  1. Warranty of the product after an initial period, and then renewed annually;
  2. Providing training to staff using the product. The warranty is only effective if staff using the equipment receive proper training.
  3. The training occurs once every three years, as the product is updated, and needs to be renewed.
  4. Updates require an annual purchase.
  5. The equipment needs to be certified and recalibrated every three years.
  6. New versions and updates to the equipment are available at discounts to existing owners.
  7. Updates on the software running the product must be updated.
  8. Other annuity streams include remote monitoring, consulting and customization fees, forums and user groups, enhanced support, a collective knowledge base access, as well as maintenance.

To customers, these were all value-added services. How these reoccurring annuity revenue streams are managed is up to the company and the customer and should be validated and employed based on the customer’s ability and willingness to pay.

Revenue streams create another benefit. They offer an opportunity for more customer contact and product loyalty. Creating a high contact product strengthens the client-customer relationship and leads to a larger referral stream and enhanced sales. What are you doing to add value to product sales and increase customer loyalty?

Start with the Business Model Canvas – Not Yet

We at the Oregon State University Advantage Accelerator are big believers in the Business Model Canvas methodology. We use the Canvas, we also use software for the Canvas, and we make our clients read the books by Steve Blank and Alex Ostervalder. However, the fact is that Canvas may put a technology entrepreneur at a disadvantage before he or she gets out of the lab.

Our clients at the University tend to be in the early stages of their development. Most of our researchers are doing cutting edge research. The entire set of potential opportunities for these clients have not yet been examined. Under normal circumstances, using the Canvas, clients would start with one or two potential target markets then try to validate the opportunity.

I suggest that this may not be the best way to begin. One of the tools, we use at our Accelerator is the opportunity matrix. The founder or Principal Investigator (PI), my co-director, mentor(s), intern(s), and I brainstorm on the possibilities of applications and industries in which this innovation can be productized. We also look at the numerous variables that could affect market entry. This tool was originated by the strategist Igor Ansoff and there are many versions found online.

The matrix provides focus and guides decision making prior to a long course of validating tests as required by Canvas methodology. Along the y-axis, we list the potential products and/or industries in that the innovation may be successful. Along the x-axis, we list variables such as size of market, ease of entry, competitive response and so on. The list of variables can be quite large and is on my version. The purpose is to determine through online research, phone calls with industry experts, which industry or market should be the top areas of concentration, which then becomes the business focus. This leads to a much clearer start on the Canvas.

The technology also needs to be checked for the opportunity as well. We have a great spreadsheet that checks on the viability of commercialization for the technology. It is similar to the opportunity matrix in that the various markets or projects are listed on the y-axis and a number of strategic questions about commercialization of technology are listed with weighting scores along the x-axis. This is another easy way to envision the technology side of the opportunity. Send me a note and I will send you either matrix.

These pre-cursors to the validating steps in Canvas will shorten the steps from hypothesis to validation testing.

It is highly likely that an entrepreneur will save time and money by doing the secondary research up front. This also creates a more focused entrepreneur who can easily begin the primary research work on Canvas.

There are a number of other activities that we take our clients through before beginning to work on Canvas. But overall, in the early assessment stages, we are seeking feasibility. Is the technology feasible within the means of customer wants? Does the business proposition make sense both in terms of its ability to succeed and financial viability?

Overall the big questions in this stage are:

  • Do I have a technology that has potential applications in the commercial market?
  • Are there customers and a market of sufficient size to make the concept for this technology viable?
  • Based on estimates of sales and expenses, do the capital and other resource requirements to start make sense? And;
  • Can you create an appropriate start-up or management team to execute the concept?

Just like in the Canvas, the answer to all the above questions is not that you believe the response, but rather, I know my response is true and here is why.

This early work provides sufficient data to understand the industry, examine an early value chain and process flow, understand your potential first and/or second market, organize yourself for validation of market(s) and get an early justification of pricing.

As I stated above, the secondary research requirements will enhance the primary research efforts required by Canvas. Go in smarter and ask better questions in order to obtain better results.