As a construction engineering management student who has held 3 internships and 4 jobs, I’ve gone through a lot of interviews, everything from working concessions at a movie theater to interviewing with big construction companies. Looking back, I didn’t realize at the time how different interview styles actually affect how fair and effective the hiring process is.
The interviews I’ve had with construction firms usually felt more structured and professional. The interviewers asked similar questions about teamwork, problem solving, and past project experience. It felt like they had a system. Now I understand that this structure helps with reliability, because every candidate is being judged in a consistent way (Week 5 Lecture 4). It also improves validity, since the questions are directly connected to the skills needed for the job.
On the other hand, my earlier interviews for entry-level jobs were way more casual. When I interviewed at the movie theater, it was basically just a conversation about my schedule and personality. That works to a point, but it relies a lot on first impressions. Unstructured interviews can introduce bias and inconsistency, which makes hiring decisions less accurate (Week 5 Lecture 4).
If I could give advice to employers, I’d say even simple jobs benefit from more structure. Having a few standard job-related questions and a clear way to evaluate answers would make the process fairer and more useful. Pairing interviews with small skills tests or situational questions could also improve overall decision-making (Week 5 Lecture 5).
From my experience, good interviews aren’t just about having a friendly conversation. They’re about creating a fair system that actually helps identify the right person for the job, no matter what level the position is.