I felt that the peer-review process was easier when the writing was better. It can be really difficult to effectively critique someones paper when there is no real focus or direction in the writing. It can also be difficult to provide useful critique when a paper is already really well written. I learned that I should be extra mindful of my organization and clarity because while it may seem clear to me because I wrote it, others may not be able to interpret the purpose of my writing as easily as I can. I’m also going to double check my transitions because those aren’t always smooth and concise.
