Categories
Uncategorized

Understanding Implicit Bias and How It Affects Hiring

After taking the Project Implicit Test, I specifically selected the Race test to investigate my implicit attitudes. The results revealed that I have a slight automatic preference for European Americans over African Americans. Initially, I was taken aback because I perceive myself as a just and open person. Nonetheless, as the provided readings explain, implicit bias occurs automatically and results from culture, media, and socialization influences. Therefore, a person does not deliberately demonstrate prejudice. Nevertheless, the implicit bias does affect behavior and decision making, even if the individual remains unaware of it. The hiring manager’s reliability diminishes when the selection process is left to the personal decisions of the interviewer without objective methods. Furthermore, validity is downgraded by the adherence of managers to hire employees who “seem right” without considering their skills and aptitudes. An example might be that a candidate looks or talks in a certain way, which instantly convinces a person of outstanding performance. The characteristic has nothing to deal with the candidate’s abilities but only with personal bias. The proper response to this situation is to train the recruiters in structured interviews and the same recruitment processes for all applicants. Additionally, I can be mindful of the automatic reactions, slow down the implicit decisions, and investigate the first impression before decision-making. Implicit bias is not limited to eliminating; however, it is reversible with awareness of the presence of reflections and intention, as Vandiver outlines.

References:
Bohnet, I. (2016). How to Take the Bias Out of Interviews. Harvard Business Review.
Knight, R. (2017). 7 Practical Ways to Reduce Bias in Your Hiring Process. SHRM.
Vandiver, B. J. (2018). Understanding Implicit Bias—and How to Work Through It. Be Better Blog.

Categories
Uncategorized

How to Make Interviews More Effective

From my experience, I realize that interviews differ greatly. Some of them seem professional and straight to the point; others are more of a friendly chat. Due to the information I learned this week, all these differences can be explained by reliability, validity, and utility of the interview.

One issue that keeps occurring to me during my practice interviews is unstructured questions. In many cases, I was asked questions that other interviewees were not, which did not allow one to compare people justly. The results of this type of interview kept depending on the interviewer’s mood and manner, which is called low reliability. In one case, the hiring manager was asking about my hobbies and weekend over a cup of coffee. It was fun and easy-going, but the issue is, the employer never found out if I could do the job-your validity was low.

According to Bohnet (2016), scoring each answer immediately after it’s given helps reduce bias and improve fairness. Since I applied for a job in a restaurant, part of the interview was a short skill test, and I was also asked questions about the time when I faced a stressful situation-at-the given an interview in this case, the validity was higher. Bohnet suggests scoring each answer after it was given but not all answers at the end of the interview help reduce bias and improve fairness. Besides that, Knight (2017) claims that structured interviews, in which the same job‐related questions are asked and scored, increase accuracy and predictability. indicates that experience is not the only indicator of future efficiency but adds learning ability and humility as the ability has reduced validity. Finally, Buckingham and Coffman (2016) state how great managers are hiring for talent and strengths, in the end, making the last job quality useful. To employers, I suggest using evidence-based interviews while focusing on an applicant’s behaviors, skill, and potential.

References
Bohnet, I. (2016). How to Take the Bias Out of Interviews. Harvard Business Review.

Buckingham, M., & Coffman, C. (2016). First, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently.

Knight, R. (2017). 7 Practical Ways to Reduce Bias in Your Hiring Process. SHRM.

Categories
Uncategorized

HR in Action: Learning to Lead

I explored four companies that appeared on the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For list of 2025: Hilton, Cisco, NVIDIA and PwC. These companies are notable because staffers consistently say they feel appreciated, trusted and supported (Great Place to Work, 2025a).

HR Practices at These Companies It puts people first, focusing on trust inclusion and empowerment of staff. A lot of its employees describe the workplace as one in which they can bring their “whole selves.”

Cisco promises flexible work policies and a strong commitment to learning and career development which should get employees on track to develop new skills (Great Place to Work, 2025b).

NVIDIA funds from a strong culture, innovation and acknowledging its employees. It is also counted among the top HR companies in India (Human Resource Executive, 2025).

PwC has continued to rise on the Best Companies list to #20 in 2025 by concentrating on growth, feedback and creating an environment where all people are able to “flourish” (PwC, 2025).

These companies embody concepts we have read about: designing work to allow employees to contribute (Breitfelder & Dowling, 2008), building capabilities through training and feedback, inspiring employees with trust and recognition (Garvin, 2013).

The Manager I Want to Be I want to be a manager who listens, empowers and helps others grow. I do believe in expectation setting, consistent feedback and opportunities in development. I want make decisions based on data.

References:

Breitfelder, M. D., & Dowling, D. W. (2008). Why did we ever go into HR? Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 39–43.

Buckingham, M., & Coffman, C. (2016). First, break all the rules: What the world’s greatest managers do differently (2016 ed.). Gallup Press.

Garvin, D. A. (2013). How Google sold its engineers on management. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 74–82.

Great Place to Work. (2025a). Hilton – Fortune 100 best companies to work for 2025. https://www.greatplacetowork.com/

Great Place to Work. (2025b). Cisco – Fortune 100 best companies to work for 2025. https://www.greatplacetowork.com/

Human Resource Executive. (2025). Most admired for HR: The top 50 companies this year. https://hrexecutive.com/

PwC. (2025). PwC named to 2025 Fortune 100 best companies to work for list.

Welcome to blogs.oregonstate.edu. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!