Before this week, I had a pretty vague idea of what unions actually do. After going through the lectures and doing some research, I now see both the positives and the downsides a lot more clearly. Labor unions advocate for fair pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, union members earn roughly 14% more than non-union workers in similar roles. And the lectures emphasized how unions protect employees from unfair treatment and give them a collective voice when dealing with management. That’s powerful.
But there are downsides too. Some critics argue that unions can protect underperforming workers and limit flexibility in the workplace. I also read that in right-to-work states, unions struggle more because they can’t require employees to pay dues even if those employees still benefit from union efforts (Kasperkevic, 2017). Employers worry about the added costs and lack of control over scheduling and raises, which I can understand.
I also talked to a friend who used to work for the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. She said the union helped her push back against unfair scheduling, but it also sometimes created tension between workers and supervisors.
Honestly, I’d consider joining a union if I worked in an environment where I felt unsafe, underpaid, or ignored. Right now, I’ve been lucky to have good managers but if that ever changed, I’d want that protection. The biggest takeaway for me is that unions can be extremely useful, but their effectiveness depends on how they’re run and the specific workplace culture.
Sources:
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Union Members Summary. www.bls.gov
- Kasperkevic, J. (2017). Why unions are so worried about right-to-work laws. Marketplace. www.marketplace.org