Aug 12 2012


Anatomy vs natural history?

Filed under Anatomy,Animals,History

“…Anatomy… differs essentially from natural history. ….natural history dwells upon forms, upon the exterior qualities of bodies, and is restricted, in whatever guise, to skimming their surfaces. Anatomy goes further: it penetrates bodies, divides them, isolates the parts of which they are composed, and seeks to lift the veil hiding the secret of their organization.”
Francesco Atommarchi, 1826A jar of moles

One response so far




One Response to “Anatomy vs natural history?”

  1.   Tamara Caulkinson 22 Aug 2012 at 14:43     1

    Intriguing juxtaposition!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply