2020 Vision: Towards a new generation of STEM learning research

Towards a new generation of STEM learning research

2020 Vision: Towards a new generation of STEM learning research

Docs

Day 2 Open Space Planning

The list of STEM Ed Research Criteria http://etherpad.com/tkW9OfxvV2

Criteria: “Learning as a cultural process and characteristics of learning in varied repertoires of practice across.”

  • Participants: Judit, Derron, Andy, Rebekah, Laia
  • Notes

Criteria: “Research should follow teaching and facilitating by parents, youth leaders, teachers and peers across settings in order to understand how different “instructional” practices afford or constrain learning in STEM disciplines.”

  • Michael Ford, Lynn Dierking, Tali Tal, Tim Zimmerman, Cindy Hmelo-Silver, Marta Civil, Nam-Hwa Kang, Nancy Stauss, Kristin Lesseig
  • Notes

Criteria: STEM learning research should use methodologies and develop theoretical frameworks that allow researchers to understand/describe/predict/transform ways in which social institutions and cultural contexts shape learning.”

  • Allyson Macdonald; Dean Grosshandler; Jim Kisiel; Katie Gillespie; Lary Enochs; Michele Crowl; Shawn Rowe
  • Notes
  • Notes

Criteria: “Research should consider how the potential for emerging technologies can shape STEM learning”

  • Joyce Malyn-Smith, Stephen Uzzo, Cindy Char, Matthew Campbell
  • Notes

Criteria: “Research should explore the capabilities/STEM learning potential of youth empowered with technology”

  • Andee Rubin, Aaron Smith, John Baek, Jill Denner, Patricia Simmons
  • Notes

Criteria: Developing an understanding of the many places, people, tools, and activities that are involved in generating and sustaining interest.

Day 1 Breakout Groups

Shared by Participants

Tools

2 Comments

2 Comments so far ↓

Leave a Comment